User talk:Jokes Free4Me: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Created page with "==Rolling back NKF== While I would ordinarily agree with wanting to retain old discussion, the only discussion actually there was about a technical problem that had since bee..." |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:Jokes_Free4Me}} | |||
==Rolling back NKF== | ==Rolling back NKF== | ||
While I would ordinarily agree with wanting to retain old discussion, the only discussion actually there was about a technical problem that had since been fixed, and thus was truly useless. I'll note for your information, also, that NKF is an admin. [[User:Magic9mushroom|Magic9mushroom]] ([[User talk:Magic9mushroom|talk]]) 20:44, 9 April 2015 (EDT) | While I would ordinarily agree with wanting to retain old discussion, the only discussion actually [[Template talk:TFTD Table|there]] was about a technical problem that had since been fixed, and thus was truly useless. I'll note for your information, also, that NKF is an admin. [[User:Magic9mushroom|Magic9mushroom]] ([[User talk:Magic9mushroom|talk]]) 20:44, 9 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
: Though I do get a few extra page management options, I generally treat myself as just another user when editing. I only throw my admin and bureaucrat powers around when I'm dealing with spammers and their pesky bots. | |||
: I'm not overly fussed with the old discussion being restored. My reasoning for removing it was simply to keep the talk page tidy as it was only a minor administrative matter that is no longer current. Still, if need be, I could always contact Spike and seek his view on the matter. We were the only two participants, after all. [[User:NKF|NKF]] ([[User talk:NKF|talk]]) 02:43, 10 April 2015 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:43, 10 April 2015
Rolling back NKF
While I would ordinarily agree with wanting to retain old discussion, the only discussion actually there was about a technical problem that had since been fixed, and thus was truly useless. I'll note for your information, also, that NKF is an admin. Magic9mushroom (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2015 (EDT)
- Though I do get a few extra page management options, I generally treat myself as just another user when editing. I only throw my admin and bureaucrat powers around when I'm dealing with spammers and their pesky bots.
- I'm not overly fussed with the old discussion being restored. My reasoning for removing it was simply to keep the talk page tidy as it was only a minor administrative matter that is no longer current. Still, if need be, I could always contact Spike and seek his view on the matter. We were the only two participants, after all. NKF (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2015 (EDT)