Accuracy vs TU Efficiency: Revision history

18 September 2016

• curprev 01:0801:08, 18 September 2016 Ant 222 talk contribs 21,179 bytes +1,048 No edit summary

2 September 2016

• curprev 22:2222:22, 2 September 2016 Magic9mushroom talk contribs m 20,131 bytes −29 →Discussion
• curprev 22:2022:20, 2 September 2016 Magic9mushroom talk contribs 20,160 bytes +293 →Discussion
• curprev 21:3821:38, 2 September 2016 Ant 222 talk contribs m 19,867 bytes −1 →Discussion
• curprev 17:0817:08, 2 September 2016 Ant 222 talk contribs 19,868 bytes +1,040 →Discussion: Added a comment
• curprev 00:5800:58, 2 September 2016 Magic9mushroom talk contribs 18,828 bytes +807 →Discussion

1 September 2016

• curprev 15:2815:28, 1 September 2016 Ant 222 talk contribs m 18,021 bytes +84 Added the attribution
• curprev 15:2715:27, 1 September 2016 Ant 222 talk contribs 17,937 bytes +433 Edited my comment in the Discussion section
• curprev 11:5811:58, 1 September 2016 Ant 222 talk contribs 17,504 bytes +2,175 No edit summary

23 July 2013

• curprev 02:5302:53, 23 July 2013 Hobbes talk contribs m 15,329 bytes +40 →TU Efficiency Mods

14 December 2008

• curprev 03:4603:46, 14 December 2008 Spike talk contribs 15,289 bytes +1,359 Slight rewrite. Added Modded data files to implement better TU Efficiency of Aimed fire.

13 December 2008

• curprev 20:4420:44, 13 December 2008 Spike talk contribs m 13,930 bytes −181 moved table to end, as this fits the discussion more logically. Corrected Blaster Bomb to N/A as it has automatic. hit. Removed XCU version of Pistol as it's the same.
• curprev 20:3820:38, 13 December 2008 Spike talk contribs 14,111 bytes +3,418 Added overview statement and data table.

7 December 2008

• curprev 02:1802:18, 7 December 2008 Arrow Quivershaft talk contribs 10,693 bytes +2,342 →Data Analysis: Various reasons aimed is better than snap.
• curprev 01:2101:21, 7 December 2008 Spike talk contribs m 8,351 bytes +539 →Data Analysis: non-firepower benefits of Aiming
• curprev 00:2700:27, 7 December 2008 Arrow Quivershaft talk contribs 7,812 bytes +619 A few counterpoints.
• curprev 00:1700:17, 7 December 2008 Spike talk contribs 7,193 bytes +1,545 Analysis of existing TU efficiency, Aimed vs Snap - not good at all

6 December 2008

• curprev 23:3923:39, 6 December 2008 Spike talk contribs 5,648 bytes +5,648 New page: Would it be unreasonable to correct the TU and/or accuracy values of human weapons, so that if we call the efficiency (hits per unit of time) K = accuracy/TUs and we have Kai (K - Aimed...