User contributions for Shadow
8 November 2007
- 15:4215:42, 8 November 2007 diff hist +1,175 m Talk:Elerium-115 No edit summary
7 November 2007
- 03:2303:23, 7 November 2007 diff hist +539 Talk:Elerium-115 No edit summary
6 November 2007
- 02:5702:57, 6 November 2007 diff hist +683 Talk:Elerium-115 No edit summary
- 02:2902:29, 6 November 2007 diff hist +1,930 Talk:Elerium-115 correct myself again :(
- 01:5501:55, 6 November 2007 diff hist +669 Talk:Elerium-115 add a note about the "yield from radius" equation and the test done to make sure the transformation from "radius from yield" was correct
- 01:1801:18, 6 November 2007 diff hist +183 Talk:Elerium-115 No edit summary
- 01:0301:03, 6 November 2007 diff hist +1,168 Talk:Elerium-115 No edit summary
- 00:2100:21, 6 November 2007 diff hist +468 Talk:Elerium-115 No edit summary
5 November 2007
- 23:3023:30, 5 November 2007 diff hist +1,898 Talk:Elerium-115 explanations of figures and a rebuttal
- 05:0905:09, 5 November 2007 diff hist +546 Talk:Elerium-115 just a bit of conjecture about the size of a reactor core explosion
- 04:5204:52, 5 November 2007 diff hist +247 Realistic Equivalents →Elerium-115: note that a reactor detonating like a bomb is not necessarily nuclear, nor does the blast have to be caused by all the available reaction mass
- 04:3604:36, 5 November 2007 diff hist +613 Realistic Equivalents →Elerium-115: Move a bit of the conjecture here and provide a real-world equivalent
4 November 2007
- 10:2410:24, 4 November 2007 diff hist +373 Talk:Elerium-115 have to correct myself - it's a lot later than I like and my mind kept telling me that "Fat Man" and "Little Boy" both were about 600kilotons rather than the average of 17kilotons
- 09:2309:23, 4 November 2007 diff hist 0 m Talk:Elerium-115 fix the '</sup> where there should be a </sub>' that I seem to have these days
- 09:2109:21, 4 November 2007 diff hist +1,156 Talk:Elerium-115 hopefully final corrections made
3 November 2007
- 21:4121:41, 3 November 2007 diff hist +1,915 Talk:Elerium-115 a bit of "armchair science" about the possible reasons Elerium reactor detonations don't cause the damage the math seems to indicate they are capable of
- 06:0306:03, 3 November 2007 diff hist +182 Talk:Elerium-115 another math correction
- 05:5405:54, 3 November 2007 diff hist +1,063 Talk:Elerium-115 correct myself. 10^5km/h is 2778m/s, not 278m/s
- 05:1205:12, 3 November 2007 diff hist +684 Talk:Elerium-115 add a note about the maximum size of a terror ships detonation
- 01:2301:23, 3 November 2007 diff hist +1,659 Talk:Elerium-115 fix my math, do some nice formatting to the information and make it available
- 00:5200:52, 3 November 2007 diff hist −1,502 Talk:Elerium-115 Undo revision 13882 by Shadow (Talk) (Based some equations on 5400nm rather than the 54000nm that was quoted.)
- 00:4800:48, 3 November 2007 diff hist +1,502 Talk:Elerium-115 note problems with the displayed math, provide (hopefully) correct math