Talk:Accuracy Formula (UFO2000): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Bomb Bloke (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
- [[User:Bomb_Bloke|Bomb Bloke]] | - [[User:Bomb_Bloke|Bomb Bloke]] | ||
-------------- | |||
Well, these can. My problem is the ones that come afterwards. Like (2/(1/wacc^2+1/sacc^2)) <- this looks real ugly. And I was wondering about maybe delving into the statistics of hitting, but without decent formula display, I really shouldn't. Gaussians and things like that. No good. | Well, these can. My problem is the ones that come afterwards. Like (2/(1/wacc^2+1/sacc^2)) <- this looks real ugly. And I was wondering about maybe delving into the statistics of hitting, but without decent formula display, I really shouldn't. Gaussians and things like that. No good. | ||
- [[User:Arcozelo|Arcozelo]] | |||
-------------- | |||
<math>\frac{2}{\frac{1}{wacc^2} + \frac{1}{sacc^2}}</math> | |||
<math>\frac{2}{\frac{sacc^2}{wacc^2 \times sacc^2} + \frac{wacc^2}{wacc^2 \times sacc^2}}</math> | |||
<math>\frac{2}{\frac{wacc^2 + sacc^2}{wacc^2 \times sacc^2}}</math> | |||
<math>\frac{2 \times wacc^2 \times sacc^2}{wacc^2 + sacc^2}</math> | |||
2 / (1 / wacc<sup>2</sup> + 1 / sacc<sup>2</sup>) | |||
2 / (sacc<sup>2</sup> / (wacc<sup>2</sup> * sacc<sup>2</sup>) + wacc<sup>2</sup> / (wacc<sup>2</sup> * sacc<sup>2</sup>)) | |||
2 / ((wacc<sup>2</sup> + sacc<sup>2</sup>) / (wacc<sup>2</sup> * sacc<sup>2</sup>)) | |||
2 * wacc<sup>2</sup> * sacc<sup>2</sup> / (wacc<sup>2</sup> + sacc<sup>2</sup>) | |||
Don't ask me about gaussians, though. I've been out of college too long. | |||
- [[User:Bomb_Bloke|Bomb Bloke]] | |||
Revision as of 02:19, 19 June 2006
There seems to be some kind of problem with the latex math formula generating. Either that or a problem with me. I'd appreciate some feedback about this, since it would look nice to have actual pretty looking formulas. And there are some very ugly formulas coming.
- Arcozelo
I guess MediaWiki isn't set up here. But, couldn't those formulas be simplified somewhat?
<math>hp &=& acc \times \frac{max.health - current.health}{\frac{max.health}{2}}</math>
<math>hp &=& \frac{2 \times acc \times (max.health - current.health)}{max.health}</math>
<math>mp &=& acc \times \frac{100 - current.morale}{\frac{100}{2}}</math>
<math>mp &=& \frac{acc \times (100 - current.morale)}{50}</math>
Or, even down to non-TeX format:
hp = acc * (max.health - current.health) / (max.health / 2) hp = 2 * acc * (max.health - current.health) / max.health
mp = acc * (100 - current.morale) / (100 / 2) mp = acc * (100 - current.morale) / 50
Well, these can. My problem is the ones that come afterwards. Like (2/(1/wacc^2+1/sacc^2)) <- this looks real ugly. And I was wondering about maybe delving into the statistics of hitting, but without decent formula display, I really shouldn't. Gaussians and things like that. No good.
- Arcozelo
<math>\frac{2}{\frac{1}{wacc^2} + \frac{1}{sacc^2}}</math>
<math>\frac{2}{\frac{sacc^2}{wacc^2 \times sacc^2} + \frac{wacc^2}{wacc^2 \times sacc^2}}</math>
<math>\frac{2}{\frac{wacc^2 + sacc^2}{wacc^2 \times sacc^2}}</math>
<math>\frac{2 \times wacc^2 \times sacc^2}{wacc^2 + sacc^2}</math>
2 / (1 / wacc2 + 1 / sacc2) 2 / (sacc2 / (wacc2 * sacc2) + wacc2 / (wacc2 * sacc2)) 2 / ((wacc2 + sacc2) / (wacc2 * sacc2)) 2 * wacc2 * sacc2 / (wacc2 + sacc2)
Don't ask me about gaussians, though. I've been out of college too long.