Talk:Armor (Long War): Difference between revisions
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The [[Damage (Long War)#In Detail|damage reduction formula]] has been published, so we know for a fact that 0.3DR = 30% chance and 0.33DR = 33% chance. Either there's a hidden 0.03 on the armour or the chance is 30% not 33%. [[User:Binkyuk|Binkyuk]] ([[User talk:Binkyuk|talk]]) 15:50, 28 August 2014 (EDT) | The [[Damage (Long War)#In Detail|damage reduction formula]] has been published, so we know for a fact that 0.3DR = 30% chance and 0.33DR = 33% chance. Either there's a hidden 0.03 on the armour or the chance is 30% not 33%. [[User:Binkyuk|Binkyuk]] ([[User talk:Binkyuk|talk]]) 15:50, 28 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
:There is some confusion with the coming beta 14 about how much damage reduction those two armors have. I will wait for Ellatan's response, it is fine as it is at the moment. | :There is some confusion with the coming beta 14 about how much damage reduction those two armors have. I will wait for Ellatan's response, it is fine as it is at the moment.--[[User:8wayz|8wayz]] ([[User talk:8wayz|talk]]) 17:35, 28 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:35, 28 August 2014
DR
The damage reduction formula has been published, so we know for a fact that 0.3DR = 30% chance and 0.33DR = 33% chance. Either there's a hidden 0.03 on the armour or the chance is 30% not 33%. Binkyuk (talk) 15:50, 28 August 2014 (EDT)