Talk:Aquatoid: Difference between revisions
Debesh Unnos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Debesh Unnos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some debate whether Sectoids or Aquatoids came first. I think that since T'leth is millions of years old, the Aquatoid was the original and the Sectoid was an evolutionary descendant.--[[User:Amitakartok|Amitakartok]] 16:58, 8 November 2008 (CST) | Some debate whether Sectoids or Aquatoids came first. I think that since T'leth is millions of years old, the Aquatoid was the original and the Sectoid was an evolutionary descendant.--[[User:Amitakartok|Amitakartok]] 16:58, 8 November 2008 (CST) | ||
:Direct quote from the Sectoid autopsy here. | :Direct quote from the Sectoid autopsy here. | ||
:"The webbing between the fingers and the flat feet suggest aquatic origins." | :"The webbing between the fingers and the flat feet suggest aquatic origins." | ||
:Seems like Aquatoids are most definitely the original species. | :Seems like Aquatoids are most definitely the original species. | ||
:[[User:Debesh Unnos|Debesh Unnos]] 20:54, 12 February 2013 (EST) | :[[User:Debesh Unnos|Debesh Unnos]] 20:54, 12 February 2013 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:50, 13 February 2013
Some debate whether Sectoids or Aquatoids came first. I think that since T'leth is millions of years old, the Aquatoid was the original and the Sectoid was an evolutionary descendant.--Amitakartok 16:58, 8 November 2008 (CST)
- Direct quote from the Sectoid autopsy here.
- "The webbing between the fingers and the flat feet suggest aquatic origins."
- Seems like Aquatoids are most definitely the original species.
- Debesh Unnos 20:54, 12 February 2013 (EST)