Talk:Air Combat (EU2012): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think Armor Penetration is how much the UFO gets shot up, IE, the scarring and holes visible on the crashed ship during the Recovery mission. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft|Arrow Quivershaft]] 21:37, 19 December 2012 (EST) | I think Armor Penetration is how much the UFO gets shot up, IE, the scarring and holes visible on the crashed ship during the Recovery mission. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft|Arrow Quivershaft]] 21:37, 19 December 2012 (EST) | ||
:Hmm, since the EMP Cannon has high armor penetration and produces the least shot up UFOs, that doesn't sound right. [[User:Binkyuk|Binkyuk]] 11:56, 20 December 2012 (EST) | :Hmm, since the EMP Cannon has high armor penetration and produces the least shot up UFOs, that doesn't sound right. [[User:Binkyuk|Binkyuk]] 11:56, 20 December 2012 (EST) | ||
Yeah, I thought of this, but there's always a lot of external scarring.... [[User:Arrow Quivershaft|Arrow Quivershaft]] 13:41, 20 December 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:41, 20 December 2012
I think Armor Penetration is how much the UFO gets shot up, IE, the scarring and holes visible on the crashed ship during the Recovery mission. Arrow Quivershaft 21:37, 19 December 2012 (EST)
- Hmm, since the EMP Cannon has high armor penetration and produces the least shot up UFOs, that doesn't sound right. Binkyuk 11:56, 20 December 2012 (EST)
Yeah, I thought of this, but there's always a lot of external scarring.... Arrow Quivershaft 13:41, 20 December 2012 (EST)