Talk:Armor (EU2012): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Agreed. Do you have the values? [[User:Hobbes|Hobbes]] 06:12, 3 October 2012 (EDT) | :Agreed. Do you have the values? [[User:Hobbes|Hobbes]] 06:12, 3 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
Well, they are in the table, so I'll delete that "movement bonus" column and place the values in "Extras" column [[User:Beltorn|Beltorn]] 08:35, 3 October 2012 (EDT) | Well, they are in the table, so I'll delete that "movement bonus" column and place the values in "Extras" column [[User:Beltorn|Beltorn]] 08:35, 3 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:I think it's easier to read how it is, TBH. Both move and Defence are present on several armours, and they're numeric values, so I think it's worth keeping them as their own thing. [[User:Momerathe|Momerathe]] 11:42, 3 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:42, 3 October 2012
I think it would be appropriate to place "movement bonus" in Extras.
- Agreed. Do you have the values? Hobbes 06:12, 3 October 2012 (EDT)
Well, they are in the table, so I'll delete that "movement bonus" column and place the values in "Extras" column Beltorn 08:35, 3 October 2012 (EDT)
- I think it's easier to read how it is, TBH. Both move and Defence are present on several armours, and they're numeric values, so I think it's worth keeping them as their own thing. Momerathe 11:42, 3 October 2012 (EDT)