Talk:Weapon Analysis: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 08:19, 22 March 2009

This will be great for any future arguments. Muton commander 20:25, 8 October 2008 (CDT)

Discussion moved to: Accuracy vs TU Efficiency

Spike, are you trying to prod NKF into a discussion of the merits of the Gas Cannon and the Gauss Pistol? ;) Arrow Quivershaft 17:46, 6 December 2008 (CST)

LOL you may be right there! Actually it's as much to prod myself, but I guess anyone can join in! :) Spike 17:56, 6 December 2008 (CST)

Expanding topic scope

I've sometimes wondered if the scope of this section is too narrow. There are lots of room for discussion many other aspects of the game. For example, armour. That could involve articles like damage analysis vs. weapons, survivability rates, etc. For vehicles discussions there could be topics like ship comparisons, how to best utilize the various ships, etc.

Any thoughts on how could this be best be done? My initial thought was a simple renaming of the section. Or perhaps separate analysis sections devoted to such topics would be better? -NKF 04:19, 22 March 2009 (EDT)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 : LOL you may be right there! Actually it's as much to prod myself, but I guess anyone can join in! :) [[User:Spike|Spike]] 17:56, 6 December 2008 (CST)
+== Expanding topic scope ==
+I've sometimes wondered if the scope of this section is too narrow. There are lots of room for discussion many other aspects of the game. For example, armour. That could involve articles like damage analysis vs. weapons, survivability rates, etc. For vehicles discussions there could be topics like ship comparisons, how to best utilize the various ships, etc.
+Any thoughts on how could this be best be done? My initial thought was a simple renaming of the section. Or perhaps separate analysis sections devoted to such topics would be better? -[[User:NKF|NKF]] 04:19, 22 March 2009 (EDT)