Talk:Stun: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:51, 14 March 2009

The stun damage for conventional weapons is randomly choosen between 0 and actual damage/4. Seb76 14:03, 9 April 2008 (PDT)

So say a weapon rated at 100 damage hits a target and rolls 4 damage, all of which the armor eats... That means no stun can be dealt, right?

- Bomb Bloke 16:25, 9 April 2008 (PDT)

Correct, if armor absorbs all the damage no stun should be applied. Unarmored units who take 4 damage points will incur either 0 or 1 pts of stun. --Zombie 20:56, 9 April 2008 (PDT)

Is stun damage for conventional weapons capped at 4? And, is stun damage counted as ADDITIONAL damage or does it convert normal damage into stun? Jasonred 02:51, 14 March 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:56, 10 April 2008 view source Zombie (talk \| contribs) Administrators 3,246 edits Reply about stun ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:51, 14 March 2009 view source Jasonred (talk \| contribs) 728 edits stun damage from normal shots Newer edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Correct, if armor absorbs all the damage no stun should be applied. Unarmored units who take 4 damage points will incur either 0 or 1 pts of stun. --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 20:56, 9 April 2008 (PDT)		Correct, if armor absorbs all the damage no stun should be applied. Unarmored units who take 4 damage points will incur either 0 or 1 pts of stun. --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 20:56, 9 April 2008 (PDT)

			Is stun damage for conventional weapons capped at 4? And, is stun damage counted as ADDITIONAL damage or does it convert normal damage into stun? [[User:Jasonred\|Jasonred]] 02:51, 14 March 2009 (EDT)