Talk:LOC.DAT: Difference between revisions
Appearance
offset 6-7 |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Count Down=== | ===Count Down=== | ||
I have some doubts about offset 6-7. The page says that it is the horizontal destination, it looks more like the time left before crash/terror site will disappear (or maybe the offset has two usages depending on the type of the location?). It is reset to 3 for as long as there is a craft targeting the site. [[User:Seb76|Seb76]] 10:45, 26 April 2008 (PDT) | I have some doubts about offset 6-7. The page says that it is the horizontal destination, it looks more like the time left before crash/terror site will disappear (or maybe the offset has two usages depending on the type of the location?). It is reset to 3 for as long as there is a craft targeting the site. [[User:Seb76|Seb76]] 10:45, 26 April 2008 (PDT) | ||
: As neither crash nor terror sites have meaningful destinations anyway (only start locations), there's no reason why these offsets can't be overloaded to mean something else in these cases. -- [[User:Zaimoni|Zaimoni]] 14:32, 26 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:32, 26 April 2008
Altitude
Shouldn't the altitude be set in this file as well? Probably one of the Unknown values, and XCOM and Alien Bases might have rubbish data in them. --Pi Masta 15:27, 8 February 2007 (PST)
Count Down
I have some doubts about offset 6-7. The page says that it is the horizontal destination, it looks more like the time left before crash/terror site will disappear (or maybe the offset has two usages depending on the type of the location?). It is reset to 3 for as long as there is a craft targeting the site. Seb76 10:45, 26 April 2008 (PDT)
- As neither crash nor terror sites have meaningful destinations anyway (only start locations), there's no reason why these offsets can't be overloaded to mean something else in these cases. -- Zaimoni 14:32, 26 April 2008 (CDT)