Talk:Yet Another Scheme: Difference between revisions
orphan page. rename / link, or delete? |
New section: Link it |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
right now, this article is just my ramblings. If someone else thinks it's actually useful, there maybe should be a link pointing here (in that case, I'd suggest it to be moved/renamed to "The way of the Privateer"). Otherwise, it ought to be deleted. You decide. --[[User:Schnobs|Schnobs]] 08:38, 9 April 2008 (PDT) | right now, this article is just my ramblings. If someone else thinks it's actually useful, there maybe should be a link pointing here (in that case, I'd suggest it to be moved/renamed to "The way of the Privateer"). Otherwise, it ought to be deleted. You decide. --[[User:Schnobs|Schnobs]] 08:38, 9 April 2008 (PDT) | ||
== Link it == | |||
I was also wondering about this orphan page. I found it by search and wondered why it was not linked. There are other strategy articles linked off the main page. This one is well written and provides a different perspective than usual. I think either we should link it off the main page, or put a Strategy link on the main page and move this and the other strategy articles to that Strategy page. [[User:Spike|Spike]] 10:52, 9 April 2008 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:52, 9 April 2008
Heya,
right now, this article is just my ramblings. If someone else thinks it's actually useful, there maybe should be a link pointing here (in that case, I'd suggest it to be moved/renamed to "The way of the Privateer"). Otherwise, it ought to be deleted. You decide. --Schnobs 08:38, 9 April 2008 (PDT)
Link it
I was also wondering about this orphan page. I found it by search and wondered why it was not linked. There are other strategy articles linked off the main page. This one is well written and provides a different perspective than usual. I think either we should link it off the main page, or put a Strategy link on the main page and move this and the other strategy articles to that Strategy page. Spike 10:52, 9 April 2008 (PDT)