Talk:Stun: Difference between revisions
Stun damage for conventional weapons |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The stun damage for conventional weapons is randomly choosen between 0 and actual damage/4. [[User:Seb76|Seb76]] 14:03, 9 April 2008 (PDT) | The stun damage for conventional weapons is randomly choosen between 0 and actual damage/4. [[User:Seb76|Seb76]] 14:03, 9 April 2008 (PDT) | ||
---- | |||
So say a weapon rated at 100 damage hits a target and rolls 4 damage, all of which the armor eats... That means no stun can be dealt, right? | |||
- [[User:Bomb Bloke|Bomb Bloke]] 16:25, 9 April 2008 (PDT) | |||
---- | |||
Correct, if armor absorbs all the damage no stun should be applied. Unarmored units who take 4 damage points will incur either 0 or 1 pts of stun. --[[User:Zombie|Zombie]] 20:56, 9 April 2008 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:58, 14 March 2009
The stun damage for conventional weapons is randomly choosen between 0 and actual damage/4. Seb76 14:03, 9 April 2008 (PDT)
So say a weapon rated at 100 damage hits a target and rolls 4 damage, all of which the armor eats... That means no stun can be dealt, right?
- Bomb Bloke 16:25, 9 April 2008 (PDT)
Correct, if armor absorbs all the damage no stun should be applied. Unarmored units who take 4 damage points will incur either 0 or 1 pts of stun. --Zombie 20:56, 9 April 2008 (PDT)