User talk:Robbx213 - Revision history

Grimlock: /* Protocols on ufopedia */ new section

2012-10-21T18:17:24Z

Protocols on ufopedia: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 21 October 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: Yeah, that play on Normal that I did got me all the way to the Overseer crash landing mission. So I realized that a bit after we talked last time. Probably would be better to just refer to the Outsider as the humanoid and leave the spoiler about the crystal elsewhere than the Alien Life Forms page? That overseer mission made me realize a hover SHIV with standard weapon and a bunch of laser rifles was not going to work. I moved so far ahead in storyline I was getting rocked every mission and like 2/3 my soldiers were in the Infirmary. Because of that, and wanting to contribute to the Research page as I go, I went back and restarted my currently on-going Classic Ironman game. I'm actually doing pretty well early on, though I did make a mistake and move my highest ranked Sgt. Assault up a tall ladder without any Overwatch; RIP Michelle "Let's Move" Obama :/ [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 19:39, 12 October 2012 (EDT)		: Yeah, that play on Normal that I did got me all the way to the Overseer crash landing mission. So I realized that a bit after we talked last time. Probably would be better to just refer to the Outsider as the humanoid and leave the spoiler about the crystal elsewhere than the Alien Life Forms page? That overseer mission made me realize a hover SHIV with standard weapon and a bunch of laser rifles was not going to work. I moved so far ahead in storyline I was getting rocked every mission and like 2/3 my soldiers were in the Infirmary. Because of that, and wanting to contribute to the Research page as I go, I went back and restarted my currently on-going Classic Ironman game. I'm actually doing pretty well early on, though I did make a mistake and move my highest ranked Sgt. Assault up a tall ladder without any Overwatch; RIP Michelle "Let's Move" Obama :/ [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 19:39, 12 October 2012 (EDT)

			== Protocols on ufopedia ==

			How would one go about requesting that a subsection be added to Gameplay Mechanics? Specifically, I've found the lack of documentation about about in-game symbology to be frustrating, and would like to contribute to fixing that. --[[User:Grimlock\|Grimlock]] 14:17, 21 October 2012 (EDT)

Robbx213 at 23:39, 12 October 2012

2012-10-12T23:39:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 12 October 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	At one point in the game you need to capture one Outsider. But when you use the Arc Thrower successfully it will turn into a Shard (the crystal) and then Dr. Vahlen discovers that the Outsider is merely the crystal receiving orders and that it is communicating with something, somewhere around on Earth... ;) [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 06:38, 12 October 2012 (EDT)		At one point in the game you need to capture one Outsider. But when you use the Arc Thrower successfully it will turn into a Shard (the crystal) and then Dr. Vahlen discovers that the Outsider is merely the crystal receiving orders and that it is communicating with something, somewhere around on Earth... ;) [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 06:38, 12 October 2012 (EDT)

			: Yeah, that play on Normal that I did got me all the way to the Overseer crash landing mission. So I realized that a bit after we talked last time. Probably would be better to just refer to the Outsider as the humanoid and leave the spoiler about the crystal elsewhere than the Alien Life Forms page? That overseer mission made me realize a hover SHIV with standard weapon and a bunch of laser rifles was not going to work. I moved so far ahead in storyline I was getting rocked every mission and like 2/3 my soldiers were in the Infirmary. Because of that, and wanting to contribute to the Research page as I go, I went back and restarted my currently on-going Classic Ironman game. I'm actually doing pretty well early on, though I did make a mistake and move my highest ranked Sgt. Assault up a tall ladder without any Overwatch; RIP Michelle "Let's Move" Obama :/ [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 19:39, 12 October 2012 (EDT)

Hobbes: outsider discussion spoiler

2012-10-12T10:38:04Z

outsider discussion *spoiler*

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:38, 12 October 2012
Line 1:	Line 1:
		*Spoiler warning*

		At one point in the game you need to capture one Outsider. But when you use the Arc Thrower successfully it will turn into a Shard (the crystal) and then Dr. Vahlen discovers that the Outsider is merely the crystal receiving orders and that it is communicating with something, somewhere around on Earth... ;) [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 06:38, 12 October 2012 (EDT)

Robbx213: Blanked the page

2012-10-10T21:45:03Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 10 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Duplicate pages ==~~

	Why are you making duplicate pages [[Ant_Farm_X:EU12]], [[Main_Page_Table_X:EU12]], [[Wiki_Tips_X:EU12]], [[Main Page Table X:EU12]]? If you are making a draft or sandbox pages, then keep them under your profile. Like [[User:Kokkan/Main_Page]], otherwise you will just clutter up the wiki and make competing pages ending up with quantity rather than quality. --[[User:Kokkan\|Kokkan]] 05:58, 4 October 2012 (EDT)

	: The pages I am creating are not linked to, and do not affect, EU (2012) or any of its linked pages. There is no clutter. Go to any Category:Enemy Unknown (2012) page you like and you will not see any of the pages I am working on. They are not duplicates, they are whole different structure that will ultimately be of higher accuracy and quality. If you don't like them, ignore them and do not manually navigate to them. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 16:59, 4 October 2012 (EDT)

	:: Yeah, not duplicates at all. Just a plain rip-off of the Situation Room page. Why not put the effort into improving the '''existing pages''' rather than start competing pages? --[[User:Kokkan\|Kokkan]] 03:11, 5 October 2012 (EDT)

	::: Go back and look at the Situation Room history and the contributions I made to it. And again, these are not competing pages. As far as I know, you're the only who knows about them. I'm doing what makes sense in my head for my own reference. I'm really excited about the game and I want to kick it's butt, hopefully getting really far in Impossible someday. To do that, I need to know the game inside and out. To know it that well, I need the info organized in a way that makes sense and I can access it efficiently. Besides, I can't really improve your existing pages when I don't have any new information... or when my edits get reverted and protected. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 12:55, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
	::: And part of it is just me fiddling around learning how this wiki thing works and whether I really want to put the time into it, or just play the game and not stress over kicking it's butt. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 13:00, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
	:::: This wiki is not your personal notepad, if you don't know much about wikis then I would advice caution and be more conservative. Duplicate pages/projects is frowned upon afaik. It's better to make additions and improvements to existing pages, and if they get reverted; then there is probably an error in them or they don't conform to wiki or local standards. Busting in and editing a Template that is standard for this entire wiki is just bull-headed. Also, discussions should be kept on talk pages. Other than that, I like your additions and would rather have them on the appropriate pages.
	~~::::Personally, I keep away from as much information as I can right now. I want to experience that through the game. --[[User:Kokkan\|Kokkan]] 16:37, 5 October 2012 (EDT)~~

	:::::I'm obviously still not understanding how the couple pages I have made interfere. How would it be different if the page were "User:Robbx213\whatever" rather than "Ant Farm"? I am definitely willing to contribute to the pages that already exist, and I will start posting suggestions in the Discussion rather than immediately making an edit, but there are some pages I would rather have in my own format. I understand there should not be a competing page and that is why I am not linking any of the pages I make nor mixing Categories. So I think, I hope, anybody coming to UFOPaedia.org will see all the pages you and Hobbes have created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself. I'm not going to redo everything, that would be a waste of my time. Really, the main thing for me is the main page; there are just too many links and clicks. Like [[Attributes (EU2012)]]; there's just a bunch of flags and then you have to click around to go back to the Soldiers page for the actual list of attributes. Seriously, I don't see how they're conflicting? If they are, would moving mine to "User:Robbx213\whatever" change the mechanics and make them invisible to everyone but me? [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 18:23, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
	::::::Robb, your idea of making a competing page is a good one but here it's something that wiki users are not used to and internally it can be confusing for the other contributors. When you mention: 'I see all the pages you and Hobbes created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself', that's something users usually never take notice of who actually first created the page (and in many cases the original poster merely made a 'stub' and linked the page). Since it's a collective effort contributors don't usually consider to 'own' the pages - someone can come and change it if the information is proven wrong. But at the same time contributors like and should to have their own 'pet projects' - but in those cases authors just put a link at their own individual [[User:Hobbes\|page]] so that other users can see their work. As an example about four years ago I reorganized the Apocalypse section because no one was interested on it, but it's not ''my'' section, I merely improved the already existing work of others.
	::::::I don't have an issue with editing directly the pages (instead of discussing on the Talk page) if the person knows what he/she is doing (has a concrete reason). One thing that you can do is find your own pet page (or project) that no one is interested or has time to develop right now - no one will bother you then (at the beginning at least).
	::::::I'll actually delete all of the pages that you're working on, when you tell me you're finished, there's no need to redo them, to clean up the wiki for unnecessary pages, just mark then with a 'Deletion' category.[[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 06:19, 6 October 2012 (EDT)

	~~== EU 2012 Table ==~~
	Hey, could you please look into the table I'm updating at [[User:Hobbes/Sandbox_page]] and tell me what you think? After I wrote the [[XCOM (EU2012)XCOM]] page (I felt necessary to give a geral overview of XCOM and its mission) I realized you're right - makes sense to group all the different strategic aspects under XCOM Headquarters, just that the way you had it organized before that didn't made sense to me. Here's the organization I'm thinking of:
	* HQ and general Base Facilities
	* Mission Control
	* Situation Room
	* Research
	* Engineering
	* XCOM Craft
	* Soldiers
	You can find a description of each category under [[XCOM (EU2012)#XCOM]]. I'm also considering making a graph to show how the 7 categories should be connected with one another in order to win the game. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 06:31, 5 October 2012 (EDT)

Hobbes: /* Duplicate pages */

2012-10-06T10:21:02Z

Duplicate pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 6 October 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:::::I'm obviously still not understanding how the couple pages I have made interfere. How would it be different if the page were "User:Robbx213\whatever" rather than "Ant Farm"? I am definitely willing to contribute to the pages that already exist, and I will start posting suggestions in the Discussion rather than immediately making an edit, but there are some pages I would rather have in my own format. I understand there should not be a competing page and that is why I am not linking any of the pages I make nor mixing Categories. So I think, I hope, anybody coming to UFOPaedia.org will see all the pages you and Hobbes have created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself. I'm not going to redo everything, that would be a waste of my time. Really, the main thing for me is the main page; there are just too many links and clicks. Like [[Attributes (EU2012)]]; there's just a bunch of flags and then you have to click around to go back to the Soldiers page for the actual list of attributes. Seriously, I don't see how they're conflicting? If they are, would moving mine to "User:Robbx213\whatever" change the mechanics and make them invisible to everyone but me? [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 18:23, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		:::::I'm obviously still not understanding how the couple pages I have made interfere. How would it be different if the page were "User:Robbx213\whatever" rather than "Ant Farm"? I am definitely willing to contribute to the pages that already exist, and I will start posting suggestions in the Discussion rather than immediately making an edit, but there are some pages I would rather have in my own format. I understand there should not be a competing page and that is why I am not linking any of the pages I make nor mixing Categories. So I think, I hope, anybody coming to UFOPaedia.org will see all the pages you and Hobbes have created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself. I'm not going to redo everything, that would be a waste of my time. Really, the main thing for me is the main page; there are just too many links and clicks. Like [[Attributes (EU2012)]]; there's just a bunch of flags and then you have to click around to go back to the Soldiers page for the actual list of attributes. Seriously, I don't see how they're conflicting? If they are, would moving mine to "User:Robbx213\whatever" change the mechanics and make them invisible to everyone but me? [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 18:23, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
	::::::Robb, your idea of making a competing page is a good one but here it's something that wiki users are not used to and internally it can be confusing for the other contributors. When you mention: 'I see all the pages you and Hobbes created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself', that's something users usually never take notice of who actually first created the page (and in many cases the original poster merely made a 'stub' and linked the page). Since it's a collective effort contributors don't usually consider to 'own' the pages - someone can come and change it if the information is proven wrong. But at the same time contributors like and should to have their own 'pet projects' - but in those cases authors just put a link at their own individual [[User:Hobbes\|page]] so that other users can see their work.		::::::Robb, your idea of making a competing page is a good one but here it's something that wiki users are not used to and internally it can be confusing for the other contributors. When you mention: 'I see all the pages you and Hobbes created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself', that's something users usually never take notice of who actually first created the page (and in many cases the original poster merely made a 'stub' and linked the page). Since it's a collective effort contributors don't usually consider to 'own' the pages - someone can come and change it if the information is proven wrong. But at the same time contributors like and should to have their own 'pet projects' - but in those cases authors just put a link at their own individual [[User:Hobbes\|page]] so that other users can see their work. As an example about four years ago I reorganized the Apocalypse section because no one was interested on it, but it's not ''my'' section, I merely improved the already existing work of others.
	::::::I don't have an issue with editing directly the pages (instead of discussing on the Talk page) if the person knows what he/she is doing (has a concrete reason). One thing that you can do is find your own pet page (or project) that no one is interested or has time to develop right now - no one will bother you then (at the beginning at least).		::::::I don't have an issue with editing directly the pages (instead of discussing on the Talk page) if the person knows what he/she is doing (has a concrete reason). One thing that you can do is find your own pet page (or project) that no one is interested or has time to develop right now - no one will bother you then (at the beginning at least).
	::::::I'll actually delete all of the pages that you're working on, when you tell me you're finished, there's no need to redo them, to clean up the wiki for unnecessary pages, just mark then with a 'Deletion' category.[[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 06:19, 6 October 2012 (EDT)		::::::I'll actually delete all of the pages that you're working on, when you tell me you're finished, there's no need to redo them, to clean up the wiki for unnecessary pages, just mark then with a 'Deletion' category.[[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 06:19, 6 October 2012 (EDT)

Hobbes: /* Duplicate pages */

2012-10-06T10:19:30Z

Duplicate pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:19, 6 October 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:::::I'm obviously still not understanding how the couple pages I have made interfere. How would it be different if the page were "User:Robbx213\whatever" rather than "Ant Farm"? I am definitely willing to contribute to the pages that already exist, and I will start posting suggestions in the Discussion rather than immediately making an edit, but there are some pages I would rather have in my own format. I understand there should not be a competing page and that is why I am not linking any of the pages I make nor mixing Categories. So I think, I hope, anybody coming to UFOPaedia.org will see all the pages you and Hobbes have created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself. I'm not going to redo everything, that would be a waste of my time. Really, the main thing for me is the main page; there are just too many links and clicks. Like [[Attributes (EU2012)]]; there's just a bunch of flags and then you have to click around to go back to the Soldiers page for the actual list of attributes. Seriously, I don't see how they're conflicting? If they are, would moving mine to "User:Robbx213\whatever" change the mechanics and make them invisible to everyone but me? [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 18:23, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		:::::I'm obviously still not understanding how the couple pages I have made interfere. How would it be different if the page were "User:Robbx213\whatever" rather than "Ant Farm"? I am definitely willing to contribute to the pages that already exist, and I will start posting suggestions in the Discussion rather than immediately making an edit, but there are some pages I would rather have in my own format. I understand there should not be a competing page and that is why I am not linking any of the pages I make nor mixing Categories. So I think, I hope, anybody coming to UFOPaedia.org will see all the pages you and Hobbes have created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself. I'm not going to redo everything, that would be a waste of my time. Really, the main thing for me is the main page; there are just too many links and clicks. Like [[Attributes (EU2012)]]; there's just a bunch of flags and then you have to click around to go back to the Soldiers page for the actual list of attributes. Seriously, I don't see how they're conflicting? If they are, would moving mine to "User:Robbx213\whatever" change the mechanics and make them invisible to everyone but me? [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 18:23, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
			::::::Robb, your idea of making a competing page is a good one but here it's something that wiki users are not used to and internally it can be confusing for the other contributors. When you mention: 'I see all the pages you and Hobbes created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself', that's something users usually never take notice of who actually first created the page (and in many cases the original poster merely made a 'stub' and linked the page). Since it's a collective effort contributors don't usually consider to 'own' the pages - someone can come and change it if the information is proven wrong. But at the same time contributors like and should to have their own 'pet projects' - but in those cases authors just put a link at their own individual [[User:Hobbes\|page]] so that other users can see their work.
			::::::I don't have an issue with editing directly the pages (instead of discussing on the Talk page) if the person knows what he/she is doing (has a concrete reason). One thing that you can do is find your own pet page (or project) that no one is interested or has time to develop right now - no one will bother you then (at the beginning at least).
			::::::I'll actually delete all of the pages that you're working on, when you tell me you're finished, there's no need to redo them, to clean up the wiki for unnecessary pages, just mark then with a 'Deletion' category.[[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 06:19, 6 October 2012 (EDT)

	== EU 2012 Table ==		== EU 2012 Table ==

Robbx213: /* Duplicate pages */

2012-10-05T22:23:28Z

Duplicate pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 5 October 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::: This wiki is not your personal notepad, if you don't know much about wikis then I would advice caution and be more conservative. Duplicate pages/projects is frowned upon afaik. It's better to make additions and improvements to existing pages, and if they get reverted; then there is probably an error in them or they don't conform to wiki or local standards. Busting in and editing a Template that is standard for this entire wiki is just bull-headed. Also, discussions should be kept on talk pages. Other than that, I like your additions and would rather have them on the appropriate pages.		:::: This wiki is not your personal notepad, if you don't know much about wikis then I would advice caution and be more conservative. Duplicate pages/projects is frowned upon afaik. It's better to make additions and improvements to existing pages, and if they get reverted; then there is probably an error in them or they don't conform to wiki or local standards. Busting in and editing a Template that is standard for this entire wiki is just bull-headed. Also, discussions should be kept on talk pages. Other than that, I like your additions and would rather have them on the appropriate pages.
	::::Personally, I keep away from as much information as I can right now. I want to experience that through the game. --[[User:Kokkan\|Kokkan]] 16:37, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		::::Personally, I keep away from as much information as I can right now. I want to experience that through the game. --[[User:Kokkan\|Kokkan]] 16:37, 5 October 2012 (EDT)

			:::::I'm obviously still not understanding how the couple pages I have made interfere. How would it be different if the page were "User:Robbx213\whatever" rather than "Ant Farm"? I am definitely willing to contribute to the pages that already exist, and I will start posting suggestions in the Discussion rather than immediately making an edit, but there are some pages I would rather have in my own format. I understand there should not be a competing page and that is why I am not linking any of the pages I make nor mixing Categories. So I think, I hope, anybody coming to UFOPaedia.org will see all the pages you and Hobbes have created without seeing any of the few pages I've created for myself. I'm not going to redo everything, that would be a waste of my time. Really, the main thing for me is the main page; there are just too many links and clicks. Like [[Attributes (EU2012)]]; there's just a bunch of flags and then you have to click around to go back to the Soldiers page for the actual list of attributes. Seriously, I don't see how they're conflicting? If they are, would moving mine to "User:Robbx213\whatever" change the mechanics and make them invisible to everyone but me? [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 18:23, 5 October 2012 (EDT)

	== EU 2012 Table ==		== EU 2012 Table ==

Kokkan at 20:41, 5 October 2012

2012-10-05T20:41:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 5 October 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::: Go back and look at the Situation Room history and the contributions I made to it. And again, these are not competing pages. As far as I know, you're the only who knows about them. I'm doing what makes sense in my head for my own reference. I'm really excited about the game and I want to kick it's butt, hopefully getting really far in Impossible someday. To do that, I need to know the game inside and out. To know it that well, I need the info organized in a way that makes sense and I can access it efficiently. Besides, I can't really improve your existing pages when I don't have any new information... or when my edits get reverted and protected. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 12:55, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		::: Go back and look at the Situation Room history and the contributions I made to it. And again, these are not competing pages. As far as I know, you're the only who knows about them. I'm doing what makes sense in my head for my own reference. I'm really excited about the game and I want to kick it's butt, hopefully getting really far in Impossible someday. To do that, I need to know the game inside and out. To know it that well, I need the info organized in a way that makes sense and I can access it efficiently. Besides, I can't really improve your existing pages when I don't have any new information... or when my edits get reverted and protected. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 12:55, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
	::: And part of it is just me fiddling around learning how this wiki thing works and whether I really want to put the time into it, or just play the game and not stress over kicking it's butt. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 13:00, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		::: And part of it is just me fiddling around learning how this wiki thing works and whether I really want to put the time into it, or just play the game and not stress over kicking it's butt. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 13:00, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
	:::: This wiki is not your personal notepad, if you don't know much about wikis then I would advice caution and be more conservative. Duplicate pages/projects is frowned upon afaik. It's better to make additions and improvements to existing pages, and if they get reverted; then there is probably an error in them or they don't conform to wiki or local standards. Busting in and editing a Template that is standard for this entire wiki is just bull-headed. Also, discussions should be kept on talk pages. Other than that, I like your additions and would rather have them on the appropriate pages. --[[User:Kokkan\|Kokkan]] 16:37, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		:::: This wiki is not your personal notepad, if you don't know much about wikis then I would advice caution and be more conservative. Duplicate pages/projects is frowned upon afaik. It's better to make additions and improvements to existing pages, and if they get reverted; then there is probably an error in them or they don't conform to wiki or local standards. Busting in and editing a Template that is standard for this entire wiki is just bull-headed. Also, discussions should be kept on talk pages. Other than that, I like your additions and would rather have them on the appropriate pages.
			::::Personally, I keep away from as much information as I can right now. I want to experience that through the game. --[[User:Kokkan\|Kokkan]] 16:37, 5 October 2012 (EDT)

	== EU 2012 Table ==		== EU 2012 Table ==

Kokkan: /* Duplicate pages */

2012-10-05T20:37:46Z

Duplicate pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 5 October 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::: Go back and look at the Situation Room history and the contributions I made to it. And again, these are not competing pages. As far as I know, you're the only who knows about them. I'm doing what makes sense in my head for my own reference. I'm really excited about the game and I want to kick it's butt, hopefully getting really far in Impossible someday. To do that, I need to know the game inside and out. To know it that well, I need the info organized in a way that makes sense and I can access it efficiently. Besides, I can't really improve your existing pages when I don't have any new information... or when my edits get reverted and protected. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 12:55, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		::: Go back and look at the Situation Room history and the contributions I made to it. And again, these are not competing pages. As far as I know, you're the only who knows about them. I'm doing what makes sense in my head for my own reference. I'm really excited about the game and I want to kick it's butt, hopefully getting really far in Impossible someday. To do that, I need to know the game inside and out. To know it that well, I need the info organized in a way that makes sense and I can access it efficiently. Besides, I can't really improve your existing pages when I don't have any new information... or when my edits get reverted and protected. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 12:55, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
	::: And part of it is just me fiddling around learning how this wiki thing works and whether I really want to put the time into it, or just play the game and not stress over kicking it's butt. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 13:00, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		::: And part of it is just me fiddling around learning how this wiki thing works and whether I really want to put the time into it, or just play the game and not stress over kicking it's butt. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 13:00, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
			:::: This wiki is not your personal notepad, if you don't know much about wikis then I would advice caution and be more conservative. Duplicate pages/projects is frowned upon afaik. It's better to make additions and improvements to existing pages, and if they get reverted; then there is probably an error in them or they don't conform to wiki or local standards. Busting in and editing a Template that is standard for this entire wiki is just bull-headed. Also, discussions should be kept on talk pages. Other than that, I like your additions and would rather have them on the appropriate pages. --[[User:Kokkan\|Kokkan]] 16:37, 5 October 2012 (EDT)

	== EU 2012 Table ==		== EU 2012 Table ==

Robbx213: /* Duplicate pages */

2012-10-05T17:00:36Z

Duplicate pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 5 October 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::: Go back and look at the Situation Room history and the contributions I made to it. And again, these are not competing pages. As far as I know, you're the only who knows about them. I'm doing what makes sense in my head for my own reference. I'm really excited about the game and I want to kick it's butt, hopefully getting really far in Impossible someday. To do that, I need to know the game inside and out. To know it that well, I need the info organized in a way that makes sense and I can access it efficiently. Besides, I can't really improve your existing pages when I don't have any new information... or when my edits get reverted and protected. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 12:55, 5 October 2012 (EDT)		::: Go back and look at the Situation Room history and the contributions I made to it. And again, these are not competing pages. As far as I know, you're the only who knows about them. I'm doing what makes sense in my head for my own reference. I'm really excited about the game and I want to kick it's butt, hopefully getting really far in Impossible someday. To do that, I need to know the game inside and out. To know it that well, I need the info organized in a way that makes sense and I can access it efficiently. Besides, I can't really improve your existing pages when I don't have any new information... or when my edits get reverted and protected. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 12:55, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
			::: And part of it is just me fiddling around learning how this wiki thing works and whether I really want to put the time into it, or just play the game and not stress over kicking it's butt. [[User:Robbx213\|Robbx213]] 13:00, 5 October 2012 (EDT)

	== EU 2012 Table ==		== EU 2012 Table ==

User talk:Robbx213 - Revision history

Grimlock: /* Protocols on ufopedia */ new section

Robbx213 at 23:39, 12 October 2012

Hobbes: outsider discussion *spoiler*

Robbx213: Blanked the page

Hobbes: /* Duplicate pages */

Hobbes: /* Duplicate pages */

Robbx213: /* Duplicate pages */

Kokkan at 20:41, 5 October 2012

Kokkan: /* Duplicate pages */

Robbx213: /* Duplicate pages */

Hobbes: outsider discussion spoiler