User talk:Necuno - Revision history

Necuno: /* A version for OpenXcom? */

2014-12-08T14:43:18Z

A version for OpenXcom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 8 December 2014
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon. --Unknown user 00:08, 3 June 2013 (EST)		Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon. --Unknown user 00:08, 3 June 2013 (EST)

	:Thank you, I am glad to hear that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] ~~([[User talk:Necuno\|talk]])~~ 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)		:Thank you, I am glad to hear that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)

Necuno: /* A version for OpenXcom? */

2014-07-17T08:05:11Z

A version for OpenXcom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:05, 17 July 2014
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:Thank you, I am glad to hear that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] ([[User talk:Necuno\|talk]]) 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)		:Thank you, I am glad to hear that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] ([[User talk:Necuno\|talk]]) 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)

	~~:To anyone who reads this: If you would like to see UFO Classes ported to OpenXcom, please sign your name below, thank you.~~

Necuno: /* A version for OpenXcom? */

2014-04-04T12:43:51Z

A version for OpenXcom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 4 April 2014
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon. --Unknown user 00:08, 3 June 2013 (EST)		Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon. --Unknown user 00:08, 3 June 2013 (EST)

	:Thank you, I am glad to ~~know~~ that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] ([[User talk:Necuno\|talk]]) 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)		:Thank you, I am glad to hear that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] ([[User talk:Necuno\|talk]]) 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)

	:To anyone who reads this: If you would like to see UFO Classes ported to OpenXcom, please sign your name below, thank you.		:To anyone who reads this: If you would like to see UFO Classes ported to OpenXcom, please sign your name below, thank you.

Necuno: /* A version for OpenXcom? */

2014-01-28T08:33:35Z

A version for OpenXcom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:33, 28 January 2014
Line 27:		Line 27:
	Now that OpenXcom is feature complete, I thought I'd give it a try. But alas, I can't use UFO Classes with it. Is there any chance that a version can be made to work with it? The save format seems to be different, so I don't know if it's possible or how hard it would be.		Now that OpenXcom is feature complete, I thought I'd give it a try. But alas, I can't use UFO Classes with it. Is there any chance that a version can be made to work with it? The save format seems to be different, so I don't know if it's possible or how hard it would be.

	Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon.		Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon. --Unknown user 00:08, 3 June 2013 (EST)

	:Thank you, I am glad to know that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] ([[User talk:Necuno\|talk]]) 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)		:Thank you, I am glad to know that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] ([[User talk:Necuno\|talk]]) 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)

	:To anyone who reads this: If you would like to see UFO Classes ported to OpenXcom, please sign your name below, thank you.		:To anyone who reads this: If you would like to see UFO Classes ported to OpenXcom, please sign your name below, thank you.

Necuno: /* A version for OpenXcom? */

2014-01-28T08:28:27Z

A version for OpenXcom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 28 January 2014
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon.		Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon.

			:Thank you, I am glad to know that people enjoy my work and I must apologize for not replying earlier. Prior to your message I was unaware of the OpenXcom project and had therefore not considered a port. I will look into the possibilities and will definitely take a closer look at OpenXcom within the next few weeks. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] ([[User talk:Necuno\|talk]]) 03:28, 28 January 2014 (EST)

			:To anyone who reads this: If you would like to see UFO Classes ported to OpenXcom, please sign your name below, thank you.

Jing: /* A version for OpenXcom? */

2013-06-03T05:08:00Z

A version for OpenXcom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:08, 3 June 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:
	I really like the UFO Classes utility. You did a great job.		I really like the UFO Classes utility. You did a great job.

	Now that OpenXcom is feature complete, I thought I'd give it a try. But alas, I can't use UFO Classes with it. Is there any chance that a version can be made to work with it? I know it's ~~probably not simple, but I hope it's not too complicated. It might even be~~ possible ~~to integrate~~ it ~~into OpenXcom as an option, but standalone~~ would be ~~fine as long as you can make it work~~.		Now that OpenXcom is feature complete, I thought I'd give it a try. But alas, I can't use UFO Classes with it. Is there any chance that a version can be made to work with it? The save format seems to be different, so I don't know if it's possible or how hard it would be.

	Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon.		Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon.

Jing: /* A version for OpenXcom? */ new section

2013-06-03T01:33:50Z

A version for OpenXcom?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:33, 3 June 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:Thank you! It has been a brainchild of mine for some time, I can only hope people will enjoy using it as much as I do. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 18:22, 10 December 2009 (EST)		:Thank you! It has been a brainchild of mine for some time, I can only hope people will enjoy using it as much as I do. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 18:22, 10 December 2009 (EST)

			== A version for OpenXcom? ==

			I really like the UFO Classes utility. You did a great job.

			Now that OpenXcom is feature complete, I thought I'd give it a try. But alas, I can't use UFO Classes with it. Is there any chance that a version can be made to work with it? I know it's probably not simple, but I hope it's not too complicated. It might even be possible to integrate it into OpenXcom as an option, but standalone would be fine as long as you can make it work.

			Thanks again for your work. Hope I can use it with OpenXcom soon.

Necuno at 22:10, 21 October 2012

2012-10-21T22:10:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 21 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hi there, I've noticed that you've added a description of your editor to the [[Talk:X-COM]] and [[Talk:Main Page]] pages and probably it is better to keep those pages clear of such content since they are meant to discuss issues. I've already asked in one of those threads if we should create a specific page for that kind of software, if everyone agrees then you can add your editor to it afterwards, until then it's better to keep it to your own personal page. And welcome to the wiki :) [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 16:59, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	~~:I just edited the entries, hope it's better now --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 15:18, 9 December 2009 (EST)~~

	== Compatibility with Seb76's loader (UFO Extender)==		== Compatibility with Seb76's loader (UFO Extender)==

Necuno: /* Soldier Classes */

2010-08-08T23:32:53Z

Soldier Classes

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 8 August 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	So far I am just reading the documentation but you have done ''loads'' of work. It is very thorough and well thought out. I am impressed. What I am really looking forward to with using it is eliminating the problem of soldier micromanagement, both during base management and also during battles. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 17:01, 10 December 2009 (EST)		So far I am just reading the documentation but you have done ''loads'' of work. It is very thorough and well thought out. I am impressed. What I am really looking forward to with using it is eliminating the problem of soldier micromanagement, both during base management and also during battles. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 17:01, 10 December 2009 (EST)

	:Thank you! It's been a brainchild of mine for some time, I can only hope people will enjoy using it as much as I do. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 18:22, 10 December 2009 (EST)		:Thank you! It has been a brainchild of mine for some time, I can only hope people will enjoy using it as much as I do. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 18:22, 10 December 2009 (EST)

Necuno: /* Compatibility with Seb76's loader (UFO Extender) */

2010-03-29T00:22:19Z

Compatibility with Seb76's loader (UFO Extender)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 29 March 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:It should, since it only edits SOLDIER.DAT. :) --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 16:10, 8 December 2009 (EST)		:It should, since it only edits SOLDIER.DAT. :) --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 16:10, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	::Zombie is perfectly correct, it is almost fully compatible with Seb76's loader. Only 2 issues arise, the "save equipment feature" is for some reason designed to recognise soldiers based on their names. This means that whenever a soldier gains level, the name will change, and thus the soldier's ~~equibment~~ setup will be forgotten. Second, the "reorganize soldiers feature" that allows you to swap soldier positions in flight will be overritten whenever the soldiers are updated. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 20:24, 8 December 2009 (EST)		::Zombie is perfectly correct, it is almost fully compatible with Seb76's loader. Only 2 issues arise, the "save equipment feature" is for some reason designed to recognise soldiers based on their names. This means that whenever a soldier gains level, the name will change, and thus the soldier's equipment setup will be forgotten. Second, the "reorganize soldiers feature" that allows you to swap soldier positions in flight will be overritten whenever the soldiers are updated. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 20:24, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	:::"Save equipment feature" incompatibility '''solved''' as of 16:28, 28 December 2009 (EST) by Seb76 whose loader now recognizes soldiers based on non-name information. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 21:07, 5 February 2010 (EST)		:::"Save equipment feature" incompatibility '''solved''' as of 16:28, 28 December 2009 (EST) by Seb76 whose loader now recognizes soldiers based on non-name information. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 21:07, 5 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 29 March 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:It should, since it only edits SOLDIER.DAT. :) --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 16:10, 8 December 2009 (EST)		:It should, since it only edits SOLDIER.DAT. :) --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 16:10, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	::Zombie is perfectly correct, it is almost fully compatible with Seb76's loader. Only 2 issues arise, the "save equipment feature" is for some reason designed to recognise soldiers based on their names. This means that whenever a soldier gains level, the name will change, and thus the soldier's ~~equibment~~ setup will be forgotten. Second, the "reorganize soldiers feature" that allows you to swap soldier positions in flight will be overritten whenever the soldiers are updated. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 20:24, 8 December 2009 (EST)		::Zombie is perfectly correct, it is almost fully compatible with Seb76's loader. Only 2 issues arise, the "save equipment feature" is for some reason designed to recognise soldiers based on their names. This means that whenever a soldier gains level, the name will change, and thus the soldier's equipment setup will be forgotten. Second, the "reorganize soldiers feature" that allows you to swap soldier positions in flight will be overritten whenever the soldiers are updated. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 20:24, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	:::"Save equipment feature" incompatibility '''solved''' as of 16:28, 28 December 2009 (EST) by Seb76 whose loader now recognizes soldiers based on non-name information. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 21:07, 5 February 2010 (EST)		:::"Save equipment feature" incompatibility '''solved''' as of 16:28, 28 December 2009 (EST) by Seb76 whose loader now recognizes soldiers based on non-name information. --[[User:Necuno\|Necuno]] 21:07, 5 February 2010 (EST)