User talk:FullAuto - Revision history

Bomb Bloke: /* Do we have to have this argument again? */

2012-03-19T05:36:31Z

Do we have to have this argument again?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 19 March 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:

	FullAuto I for one am grateful for your cleanup efforts in general. But I do agree with others that there is no reason to remove title case. Title case is actually helpful for names of things and also for, er, titles. [[User:Spike\|Spike]]		FullAuto I for one am grateful for your cleanup efforts in general. But I do agree with others that there is no reason to remove title case. Title case is actually helpful for names of things and also for, er, titles. [[User:Spike\|Spike]]

			Another note - altering headers breaks links. - <span style="font-size:xx-small"> [[User:Bomb_Bloke\|Bomb Bloke]] ([[User_talk:Bomb_Bloke\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Bomb_Bloke\|Contribs]])</span> 01:36, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

Spike: /* Do we have to have this argument again? */

2012-02-15T09:09:34Z

Do we have to have this argument again?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 15 February 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Title case isn't that bad, and some of the things you are uncapitalising are capitalised in-game. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 17:55, 14 February 2012 (EST)		Title case isn't that bad, and some of the things you are uncapitalising are capitalised in-game. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 17:55, 14 February 2012 (EST)

			FullAuto I for one am grateful for your cleanup efforts in general. But I do agree with others that there is no reason to remove title case. Title case is actually helpful for names of things and also for, er, titles. [[User:Spike\|Spike]]

Magic9mushroom at 22:55, 14 February 2012

2012-02-14T22:55:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 14 February 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	==Disagreement==		==Disagreement==
	Your uncapitalisation of item names e.g. "Mind Probe" -> "mind probe" makes it harder to read the articles. It's especially annoying when they're capitalised in-game. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 01:49, 2 August 2009 (EDT)		Your uncapitalisation of item names e.g. "Mind Probe" -> "mind probe" makes it harder to read the articles. It's especially annoying when they're capitalised in-game. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 01:49, 2 August 2009 (EDT)

			==Do we have to have this argument again?==

			Title case isn't that bad, and some of the things you are uncapitalising are capitalised in-game. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 17:55, 14 February 2012 (EST)

Magic9mushroom at 05:49, 2 August 2009

2009-08-02T05:49:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:49, 2 August 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:

	==Disagreement==		==Disagreement==
	Your uncapitalisation of item names e.g. "Mind Probe" -> "mind probe" makes it harder to read the articles. It's especially annoying when they're capitalised in-game.		Your uncapitalisation of item names e.g. "Mind Probe" -> "mind probe" makes it harder to read the articles. It's especially annoying when they're capitalised in-game. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 01:49, 2 August 2009 (EDT)

Magic9mushroom at 05:49, 2 August 2009

2009-08-02T05:49:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:49, 2 August 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	To add a second voice, I agree with Zombie. I think it's good that you are tightening up the wording of some articles, making them a bit less 'chatty', and applying Wiki standards, but some of the Wikipedia standards have never been applied here so it would be a very large amount of work, with limited benefit, to apply them now. But thank you for the editing work. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 06:46, 18 July 2009 (EDT)		To add a second voice, I agree with Zombie. I think it's good that you are tightening up the wording of some articles, making them a bit less 'chatty', and applying Wiki standards, but some of the Wikipedia standards have never been applied here so it would be a very large amount of work, with limited benefit, to apply them now. But thank you for the editing work. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 06:46, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
	:Thanks chaps. It's fair enough, I'm not expecting a massive improvement in the wiki through these edits, it's just a bit of smartening up and standardising. [[User:FullAuto\|FullAuto]] 17:55, 1 August 2009 (EDT)		:Thanks chaps. It's fair enough, I'm not expecting a massive improvement in the wiki through these edits, it's just a bit of smartening up and standardising. [[User:FullAuto\|FullAuto]] 17:55, 1 August 2009 (EDT)

			==Disagreement==
			Your uncapitalisation of item names e.g. "Mind Probe" -> "mind probe" makes it harder to read the articles. It's especially annoying when they're capitalised in-game.

FullAuto at 21:55, 1 August 2009

2009-08-01T21:55:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 1 August 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	To add a second voice, I agree with Zombie. I think it's good that you are tightening up the wording of some articles, making them a bit less 'chatty', and applying Wiki standards, but some of the Wikipedia standards have never been applied here so it would be a very large amount of work, with limited benefit, to apply them now. But thank you for the editing work. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 06:46, 18 July 2009 (EDT)		To add a second voice, I agree with Zombie. I think it's good that you are tightening up the wording of some articles, making them a bit less 'chatty', and applying Wiki standards, but some of the Wikipedia standards have never been applied here so it would be a very large amount of work, with limited benefit, to apply them now. But thank you for the editing work. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 06:46, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
			:Thanks chaps. It's fair enough, I'm not expecting a massive improvement in the wiki through these edits, it's just a bit of smartening up and standardising. [[User:FullAuto\|FullAuto]] 17:55, 1 August 2009 (EDT)

Spike: New section: echo Zombie

2009-07-18T10:46:42Z

New section: echo Zombie

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 18 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hi FullAuto. Just so you are aware, <b>all</b> the <i>See Also</i>'s (including normal headers) are capitalized on this site. So you'll be doing lots and lots of editing just to gain no measurable improvement or readability. Yeah, I realize the Wikipedia uses small caps for the second to the last words in a header. But capitalizing all words in a header is the way we've always done it. And personally, I don't think it detracts or makes things harder to follow. Though I'm just one voice in a crowd here. --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 22:27, 17 July 2009 (EDT)		Hi FullAuto. Just so you are aware, <b>all</b> the <i>See Also</i>'s (including normal headers) are capitalized on this site. So you'll be doing lots and lots of editing just to gain no measurable improvement or readability. Yeah, I realize the Wikipedia uses small caps for the second to the last words in a header. But capitalizing all words in a header is the way we've always done it. And personally, I don't think it detracts or makes things harder to follow. Though I'm just one voice in a crowd here. --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 22:27, 17 July 2009 (EDT)

			== echo Zombie ==

			To add a second voice, I agree with Zombie. I think it's good that you are tightening up the wording of some articles, making them a bit less 'chatty', and applying Wiki standards, but some of the Wikipedia standards have never been applied here so it would be a very large amount of work, with limited benefit, to apply them now. But thank you for the editing work. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 06:46, 18 July 2009 (EDT)

Zombie: Capitalizing words in a header (category).

2009-07-18T02:27:38Z

Capitalizing words in a header (category).

New page

Hi FullAuto. Just so you are aware, <b>all</b> the <i>See Also</i>'s (including normal headers) are capitalized on this site. So you'll be doing lots and lots of editing just to gain no measurable improvement or readability. Yeah, I realize the Wikipedia uses small caps for the second to the last words in a header. But capitalizing all words in a header is the way we've always done it. And personally, I don't think it detracts or makes things harder to follow. Though I'm just one voice in a crowd here. --[[User:Zombie|Zombie]] 22:27, 17 July 2009 (EDT)