User talk:Arrow Quivershaft - Revision history

Hobbes: /* I'm back */

2013-12-07T18:18:56Z

I'm back

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 7 December 2013
Line 255:		Line 255:

	I was going to announce I'm back again, but I've noticed a pattern. I slumber for long periods, and then return here whenever new content is released and do all sorts of fiddling. So I'm not leaving, so much as hibernating. Or something. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 22:18, 6 December 2013 (EST)		I was going to announce I'm back again, but I've noticed a pattern. I slumber for long periods, and then return here whenever new content is released and do all sorts of fiddling. So I'm not leaving, so much as hibernating. Or something. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 22:18, 6 December 2013 (EST)
			:Welcome back from your hibernation. :) [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 13:18, 7 December 2013 (EST)

Arrow Quivershaft: /* I'm back */

2013-12-07T03:18:45Z

I'm back

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 7 December 2013
Line 252:		Line 252:

	Spike: Thanks! And no, actually, I don't know who Hatfarm is. Feel free to enlighten me further. (And now I should be back on the long-term; got swamped with work after we suffered a staffing shortage due to situations beyond our control.) [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 13:20, 14 October 2009 (EDT)		Spike: Thanks! And no, actually, I don't know who Hatfarm is. Feel free to enlighten me further. (And now I should be back on the long-term; got swamped with work after we suffered a staffing shortage due to situations beyond our control.) [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 13:20, 14 October 2009 (EDT)


			I was going to announce I'm back again, but I've noticed a pattern. I slumber for long periods, and then return here whenever new content is released and do all sorts of fiddling. So I'm not leaving, so much as hibernating. Or something. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 22:18, 6 December 2013 (EST)

Arrow Quivershaft: /* I'm back */ Response to Spike.

2009-10-14T17:20:56Z

I'm back: Response to Spike.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 14 October 2009
Line 250:		Line 250:

	: Great to see you back AQ! I'm sure the edit rate will rise noticeably. Just wanted to check - you know who Hatfarm is right? A living legend, as it were. Assuming this is '''the''' Hatfarm ;) [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 13:44, 15 September 2009 (EDT)		: Great to see you back AQ! I'm sure the edit rate will rise noticeably. Just wanted to check - you know who Hatfarm is right? A living legend, as it were. Assuming this is '''the''' Hatfarm ;) [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 13:44, 15 September 2009 (EDT)

			Spike: Thanks! And no, actually, I don't know who Hatfarm is. Feel free to enlighten me further. (And now I should be back on the long-term; got swamped with work after we suffered a staffing shortage due to situations beyond our control.) [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 13:20, 14 October 2009 (EDT)

Spike: /* I'm back */ Chapeau agriculture

2009-09-15T17:44:04Z

I'm back: Chapeau agriculture

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 15 September 2009
Line 248:		Line 248:

	Feel free to bring my attention to anything you want my input on here, or just leave comments. Thanks! [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 12:30, 14 September 2009 (EDT)		Feel free to bring my attention to anything you want my input on here, or just leave comments. Thanks! [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 12:30, 14 September 2009 (EDT)

			: Great to see you back AQ! I'm sure the edit rate will rise noticeably. Just wanted to check - you know who Hatfarm is right? A living legend, as it were. Assuming this is '''the''' Hatfarm ;) [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 13:44, 15 September 2009 (EDT)

Arrow Quivershaft: RUN, COWARD!

2009-09-14T16:30:13Z

RUN, COWARD!

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 14 September 2009
Line 239:		Line 239:
	OR 2 avengers being repaired for 3 days each, 1 undamaged avenger, and 1 avenger repaired for 1 weeks.		OR 2 avengers being repaired for 3 days each, 1 undamaged avenger, and 1 avenger repaired for 1 weeks.
	I will explain in more detail on Avenger page. [[User:Jasonred\|Jasonred]] 04:50, 21 March 2009 (EDT)		I will explain in more detail on Avenger page. [[User:Jasonred\|Jasonred]] 04:50, 21 March 2009 (EDT)


			==I'm back==

			Sorry for disappearing like that for so long. Schoolwork kicked up earlier this year and so I stopped checking here. Then I was helping to organize a convention as a member of the staff, and had a month-long vacation. Then I worked almost every day for the rest of the summer, and didn't want to try and catch up.

			But I'm back around now, so expect my return to editing posts and offering tips. :>

			Feel free to bring my attention to anything you want my input on here, or just leave comments. Thanks! [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 12:30, 14 September 2009 (EDT)

Jasonred: /* Avengers vs. Battleships */

2009-03-21T08:50:50Z

Avengers vs. Battleships

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 21 March 2009
Line 234:		Line 234:

	Myself, I've never had a problem soloing Battleships with Avengers, if I have a large number. The way I always look at it is having one Battleship in the shop for 4 weeks is better than having 4 Avengers each in the shop for one week, because having 4 Avengers out of commission is a much bigger drain on my air superiority for that week. Also note that launching additional Avengers to intercept a UFO uses more Elerium. That said, there is no right or wrong way to do it, really. Just personal preference. I'd like to ask you to keep in mind that in most cases on this wiki, there's more than one side of the argument and both should be presented, with both pros and cons of each. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 20:36, 20 March 2009 (EDT)		Myself, I've never had a problem soloing Battleships with Avengers, if I have a large number. The way I always look at it is having one Battleship in the shop for 4 weeks is better than having 4 Avengers each in the shop for one week, because having 4 Avengers out of commission is a much bigger drain on my air superiority for that week. Also note that launching additional Avengers to intercept a UFO uses more Elerium. That said, there is no right or wrong way to do it, really. Just personal preference. I'd like to ask you to keep in mind that in most cases on this wiki, there's more than one side of the argument and both should be presented, with both pros and cons of each. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 20:36, 20 March 2009 (EDT)

			: The trouble is, thanks to my research results, your options are
			1 avenger in repairs for 6 weeks...
			OR 2 avengers being repaired for 3 days each, 1 undamaged avenger, and 1 avenger repaired for 1 weeks.
			I will explain in more detail on Avenger page. [[User:Jasonred\|Jasonred]] 04:50, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

Arrow Quivershaft: /* Posts that belong elsewhere! */ 4 Avengers down for 1 week is worse than 1 Avenger down for 4 weeks, in my opinion. Also, comment to Jasonred.

2009-03-21T00:36:00Z

Posts that belong elsewhere!: 4 Avengers down for 1 week is worse than 1 Avenger down for 4 weeks, in my opinion. Also, comment to Jasonred.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 21 March 2009
Line 228:		Line 228:

	Since I continue to have severe trouble editing the UFOpaedia due to frequent Internal Server Errors, I am going to begin pasting my comments that belong in other locations to my Talk page. If others could move them to the appropriate location, that would be greatly appreciated!		Since I continue to have severe trouble editing the UFOpaedia due to frequent Internal Server Errors, I am going to begin pasting my comments that belong in other locations to my Talk page. If others could move them to the appropriate location, that would be greatly appreciated!

			===Talk:Avenger===

			====Avengers vs. Battleships====

			Myself, I've never had a problem soloing Battleships with Avengers, if I have a large number. The way I always look at it is having one Battleship in the shop for 4 weeks is better than having 4 Avengers each in the shop for one week, because having 4 Avengers out of commission is a much bigger drain on my air superiority for that week. Also note that launching additional Avengers to intercept a UFO uses more Elerium. That said, there is no right or wrong way to do it, really. Just personal preference. I'd like to ask you to keep in mind that in most cases on this wiki, there's more than one side of the argument and both should be presented, with both pros and cons of each. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 20:36, 20 March 2009 (EDT)

Arrow Quivershaft: Since I can't edit multiple segments of the UFOpaedia, I will post comments here that belong on those segments; I ask that others lend a hand in putting them where they belong!

2009-03-21T00:35:14Z

Since I can't edit multiple segments of the UFOpaedia, I will post comments here that belong on those segments; I ask that others lend a hand in putting them where they belong!

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:35, 21 March 2009
Line 222:		Line 222:

	:Hey, no problem. It happens and I'm used to it. :) [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 19:32, 8 March 2009 (CDT)		:Hey, no problem. It happens and I'm used to it. :) [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 19:32, 8 March 2009 (CDT)



			==Posts that belong elsewhere!==

			Since I continue to have severe trouble editing the UFOpaedia due to frequent Internal Server Errors, I am going to begin pasting my comments that belong in other locations to my Talk page. If others could move them to the appropriate location, that would be greatly appreciated!

Arrow Quivershaft: No harm, no foul.

2009-03-09T00:32:32Z

No harm, no foul.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 9 March 2009
Line 220:		Line 220:

	Sorry about getting your name wrong, that was weird! I'm glad you fixed it. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 19:22, 8 March 2009 (CDT)		Sorry about getting your name wrong, that was weird! I'm glad you fixed it. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 19:22, 8 March 2009 (CDT)

			:Hey, no problem. It happens and I'm used to it. :) [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 19:32, 8 March 2009 (CDT)

Spike: New section: Oops!

2009-03-09T00:22:11Z

New section: Oops!

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 9 March 2009
Line 216:		Line 216:

	:Heh, no problem. In fact, it was never removed; just shoved further down the page. As for mechanics, that was something I found out a few months ago from Zombie and meant to add to the UFOpaedia, but got sidetracked and so only recently got around to adding it. But glad it'll help! [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 09:45, 11 October 2008 (CDT)		:Heh, no problem. In fact, it was never removed; just shoved further down the page. As for mechanics, that was something I found out a few months ago from Zombie and meant to add to the UFOpaedia, but got sidetracked and so only recently got around to adding it. But glad it'll help! [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 09:45, 11 October 2008 (CDT)

			== Oops! ==

			Sorry about getting your name wrong, that was weird! I'm glad you fixed it. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 19:22, 8 March 2009 (CDT)