User talk:Amitakartok - Revision history

NKF: /* Aftermath */

2011-04-07T08:31:54Z

Aftermath

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 7 April 2011
Line 157:		Line 157:
	:::: If there is one, it's not on this wiki nor is it hosted on the Strategycore server. With zillions of files, they're a bit resource heavy, but after what we've done here, doesn't it feel like more games should have their own specialised in-depth wikis? Just a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 02:52, 1 April 2011 (EDT)		:::: If there is one, it's not on this wiki nor is it hosted on the Strategycore server. With zillions of files, they're a bit resource heavy, but after what we've done here, doesn't it feel like more games should have their own specialised in-depth wikis? Just a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 02:52, 1 April 2011 (EDT)
	No reason why we couldn't start a section for Aftermath by making an entry on the Main Page, in the Sequels section, then adding articles which all have " (Aftermath)" appended to the article title. I guess the protocol is to raise the suggestion in Talk:Main Page, right? [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 05:32, 1 April 2011 (EDT)		No reason why we couldn't start a section for Aftermath by making an entry on the Main Page, in the Sequels section, then adding articles which all have " (Aftermath)" appended to the article title. I guess the protocol is to raise the suggestion in Talk:Main Page, right? [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 05:32, 1 April 2011 (EDT)

			: The main problem is that it's not an X-COM title despite its striking similarities. Still, with three games, and having quite extensive topics to cover, nothing to stop putting a proposal forward to [[User:Pete\|Pete]] and see if the After- series could get its own wiki, or maybe even a more general purpose strategy game wiki? Worth a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 04:31, 7 April 2011 (EDT)

Spike: /* Aftermath */

2011-04-01T09:32:07Z

Aftermath

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 1 April 2011
Line 156:		Line 156:
	:::''No, seriously. What wiki? Is there an Aftermath wiki I don't know about?''		:::''No, seriously. What wiki? Is there an Aftermath wiki I don't know about?''
	:::: If there is one, it's not on this wiki nor is it hosted on the Strategycore server. With zillions of files, they're a bit resource heavy, but after what we've done here, doesn't it feel like more games should have their own specialised in-depth wikis? Just a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 02:52, 1 April 2011 (EDT)		:::: If there is one, it's not on this wiki nor is it hosted on the Strategycore server. With zillions of files, they're a bit resource heavy, but after what we've done here, doesn't it feel like more games should have their own specialised in-depth wikis? Just a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 02:52, 1 April 2011 (EDT)
			No reason why we couldn't start a section for Aftermath by making an entry on the Main Page, in the Sequels section, then adding articles which all have " (Aftermath)" appended to the article title. I guess the protocol is to raise the suggestion in Talk:Main Page, right? [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 05:32, 1 April 2011 (EDT)

NKF: /* Aftermath */

2011-04-01T06:52:31Z

Aftermath

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:52, 1 April 2011
Line 155:		Line 155:
	:: Ah, good point! :) [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 15:32, 30 March 2011 (EDT)		:: Ah, good point! :) [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 15:32, 30 March 2011 (EDT)
	:::''No, seriously. What wiki? Is there an Aftermath wiki I don't know about?''		:::''No, seriously. What wiki? Is there an Aftermath wiki I don't know about?''
			:::: If there is one, it's not on this wiki nor is it hosted on the Strategycore server. With zillions of files, they're a bit resource heavy, but after what we've done here, doesn't it feel like more games should have their own specialised in-depth wikis? Just a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 02:52, 1 April 2011 (EDT)

Amitakartok: /* Aftermath */

2011-03-31T12:50:52Z

Aftermath

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 31 March 2011
Line 154:		Line 154:
	:''What wiki?''		:''What wiki?''
	:: Ah, good point! :) [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 15:32, 30 March 2011 (EDT)		:: Ah, good point! :) [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 15:32, 30 March 2011 (EDT)
			:::''No, seriously. What wiki? Is there an Aftermath wiki I don't know about?''

Spike: /* No action */

2011-03-30T21:44:03Z

No action

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 30 March 2011
Line 134:		Line 134:
	:''I sent out the 'ranger. Nothing. But what about the super-Plasma Pistols? In my previous session a Muton autofired into my soldier three times at pointblank range with no damage. Now, it can kill from a 20-hex radius. What happened? The stronger I am, the more the AI cheats or what?''		:''I sent out the 'ranger. Nothing. But what about the super-Plasma Pistols? In my previous session a Muton autofired into my soldier three times at pointblank range with no damage. Now, it can kill from a 20-hex radius. What happened? The stronger I am, the more the AI cheats or what?''

	~~Kepep~~ at least one aircraft on station in the alien 'target zone' at all times. You may not get lucky but it's better than doing nothing. Probably you need to build some detection bases. And get Hyperwave Decoders. However, dry periods do happen, so it's important to keep some cash (or saleable) reserves. As for the plasma pistols, both results (good and bad) are just part of the normal random variability in the game. It's not a conspiracy. The AI does cheat, but not on damage rolls.		Keep at least one aircraft on station in the alien 'target zone' at all times. You may not get lucky but it's better than doing nothing. Probably you need to build some detection bases. And get Hyperwave Decoders. However, dry periods do happen, so it's important to keep some cash (or saleable) reserves. As for the plasma pistols, both results (good and bad) are just part of the normal random variability in the game. It's not a conspiracy. The AI does cheat, but not on damage rolls.
	[[User:Spike\|Spike]] 16:02, 13 November 2008 (CST)		[[User:Spike\|Spike]] 16:02, 13 November 2008 (CST)

Spike: /* Aftermath */

2011-03-30T19:32:03Z

Aftermath

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 30 March 2011
Line 153:		Line 153:
	Hey, great description of Aftermath. Maybe you should add it to the main wiki? I don't think we have much on Aftermath here. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 17:47, 28 March 2011 (EDT)		Hey, great description of Aftermath. Maybe you should add it to the main wiki? I don't think we have much on Aftermath here. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 17:47, 28 March 2011 (EDT)
	:''What wiki?''		:''What wiki?''
			:: Ah, good point! :) [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 15:32, 30 March 2011 (EDT)

Amitakartok at 14:08, 30 March 2011

2011-03-30T14:08:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 30 March 2011
Line 152:		Line 152:

	Hey, great description of Aftermath. Maybe you should add it to the main wiki? I don't think we have much on Aftermath here. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 17:47, 28 March 2011 (EDT)		Hey, great description of Aftermath. Maybe you should add it to the main wiki? I don't think we have much on Aftermath here. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 17:47, 28 March 2011 (EDT)
			:''What wiki?''

Spike: /* Aftermath */ new section

2011-03-28T21:47:01Z

Aftermath: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 28 March 2011
Line 148:		Line 148:

	Just wanted to call your attention to [[Talk:Pact]]. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 13:09, 15 November 2008 (CST)		Just wanted to call your attention to [[Talk:Pact]]. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 13:09, 15 November 2008 (CST)

			== Aftermath ==

			Hey, great description of Aftermath. Maybe you should add it to the main wiki? I don't think we have much on Aftermath here. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 17:47, 28 March 2011 (EDT)

Arrow Quivershaft: Check Talk:Pact

2008-11-15T19:09:32Z

Check Talk:Pact

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 15 November 2008
Line 144:		Line 144:

	:''I left this base alone so that I could milk it; however, it's a Snakeman base, plus it's night when the Supply Ship comes. Oh well, maybe if I keep achieving high scores in North America, they will return.''		:''I left this base alone so that I could milk it; however, it's a Snakeman base, plus it's night when the Supply Ship comes. Oh well, maybe if I keep achieving high scores in North America, they will return.''

			==Nations returning to funding status==

			Just wanted to call your attention to [[Talk:Pact]]. [[User:Arrow Quivershaft\|Arrow Quivershaft]] 13:09, 15 November 2008 (CST)

Amitakartok at 18:15, 15 November 2008

2008-11-15T18:15:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 15 November 2008
Line 143:		Line 143:
	Hey it's not the worst thing if the Americas go over to the aliens and you have a base smack in the middle, hopefully it will make it easier to intercept their supply ships and raid their bases etc. Every cloud has a silver lining! [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 11:35, 15 November 2008 (CST)		Hey it's not the worst thing if the Americas go over to the aliens and you have a base smack in the middle, hopefully it will make it easier to intercept their supply ships and raid their bases etc. Every cloud has a silver lining! [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 11:35, 15 November 2008 (CST)

	:I left this base alone so that I could milk it; however, it's a Snakeman base, plus it's night when the Supply Ship comes.		:''I left this base alone so that I could milk it; however, it's a Snakeman base, plus it's night when the Supply Ship comes. Oh well, maybe if I keep achieving high scores in North America, they will return.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 7 April 2011
Line 157:		Line 157:
	:::: If there is one, it's not on this wiki nor is it hosted on the Strategycore server. With zillions of files, they're a bit resource heavy, but after what we've done here, doesn't it feel like more games should have their own specialised in-depth wikis? Just a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 02:52, 1 April 2011 (EDT)		:::: If there is one, it's not on this wiki nor is it hosted on the Strategycore server. With zillions of files, they're a bit resource heavy, but after what we've done here, doesn't it feel like more games should have their own specialised in-depth wikis? Just a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 02:52, 1 April 2011 (EDT)
	No reason why we couldn't start a section for Aftermath by making an entry on the Main Page, in the Sequels section, then adding articles which all have " (Aftermath)" appended to the article title. I guess the protocol is to raise the suggestion in Talk:Main Page, right? [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 05:32, 1 April 2011 (EDT)		No reason why we couldn't start a section for Aftermath by making an entry on the Main Page, in the Sequels section, then adding articles which all have " (Aftermath)" appended to the article title. I guess the protocol is to raise the suggestion in Talk:Main Page, right? [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 05:32, 1 April 2011 (EDT)

			: The main problem is that it's not an X-COM title despite its striking similarities. Still, with three games, and having quite extensive topics to cover, nothing to stop putting a proposal forward to [[User:Pete\|Pete]] and see if the After- series could get its own wiki, or maybe even a more general purpose strategy game wiki? Worth a thought. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 04:31, 7 April 2011 (EDT)