Talk:Sub Armaments - Revision history

Spike: Clean up RoF discussion now results are posted to main page

2012-09-27T13:30:18Z

Clean up RoF discussion now results are posted to main page

Spike: /* Empirical Data */ typo

2012-09-26T21:00:17Z

Empirical Data: typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 26 September 2012
Line 109:		Line 109:
	Gas 1 1 1		Gas 1 1 1
	Ajax 16 12 8		Ajax 16 12 8
	DUP 24 16 12		DUP 24 18 12
	Gauss 6 6 6		Gauss 6 6 6
	Sonic 6 6 6		Sonic 6 6 6

Spike: /* USO observed rates of fire - empirical data and possible explanations */

2012-09-24T23:12:27Z

USO observed rates of fire - empirical data and possible explanations

@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 :::''Edit: Although the attack type does not appear here, I suspect that while a missile is "traveling", the countdown is not changed. As a result, closer ranges means higher rates of fire. Seb76 07:36, 5 July 2009 (EDT) ''
 ::Note that Seb did not provide the code offset in the executable. Personally I don't think the firing rate is based on range. My tests show a strong correlation with firing rate on Attack Mode (for missiles only), and no correlation with range. I did ask Seb to check if the same algorithm was used for XCom craft but he hasn't replied yet. I can't find where from, but elsewhere I've come to the conclusion that the XCom craft firing rate formula is the same, except it doesn't have the speed-up factor based on Difficulty Level. Zombie it would be great if you could check this, and also check for TFTD. However based on the test data, it looks like it. Or put another way, if we assume XCom weaons use the same formula as the UFOs, then the "firing rate" factors for the XCom weapons are as noted in my draft article. [[User:Spike|Spike]] 14:03, 11 December 2009 (EST)
 == Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates) ==

Spike: /* caution added */

2012-09-08T23:29:44Z

caution added

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 8 September 2012
Line 98:		Line 98:

	This table is based on the assumption that TFTD craft weapons have 'equivalent' EU craft weapons, and that the relative ''actual'' firing rates (relative to the Cannon/Gas Cannon) are the same in TFTD as ''observed'' in EU.		This table is based on the assumption that TFTD craft weapons have 'equivalent' EU craft weapons, and that the relative ''actual'' firing rates (relative to the Cannon/Gas Cannon) are the same in TFTD as ''observed'' in EU.

			'''All damage-related values are nominal, i.e. ''maximum'' values. Effective average values will be ~75% of these values. '''

	<table {{StdCenterTable}} class="sortable">		<table {{StdCenterTable}} class="sortable">

NKF: /* Weapon comparison */

2009-12-13T09:29:00Z

Weapon comparison

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 13 December 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	::::Hmm, not sure. Up until now, Weapon Analysis has been used exclusively for tactical weapons, Battlescape weapons. Sub/aircraft weapons have a quite different set of factors and considerations. Personally I think it's best to keep them separate. I agree with you completely though that there is a need for cleanup and probably some kind of consolidation. I would just prefer not to consolidate onto the Weapon Analysis area, because I think it will make that area less coherent. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 15:31, 10 December 2009 (EST)		::::Hmm, not sure. Up until now, Weapon Analysis has been used exclusively for tactical weapons, Battlescape weapons. Sub/aircraft weapons have a quite different set of factors and considerations. Personally I think it's best to keep them separate. I agree with you completely though that there is a need for cleanup and probably some kind of consolidation. I would just prefer not to consolidate onto the Weapon Analysis area, because I think it will make that area less coherent. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 15:31, 10 December 2009 (EST)

			:::::The weapon analysis section was created with their inclusion in mind. But you're right, it does cater more to the troop weapons. Perhaps a separate analysis section for craft weapons would be the best option. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 04:29, 13 December 2009 (EST)

	== TFTD Observed Rates of Fire? ==		== TFTD Observed Rates of Fire? ==

Spike: /* Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates) */ added first shot average damage

2009-12-11T23:17:43Z

Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates): added first shot average damage

Spike: /* Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates) */

2009-12-11T23:02:50Z

Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates)

Spike: New section: Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates)

2009-12-11T22:52:15Z

New section: Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 11 December 2009
Line 92:		Line 92:
	:::''Edit: Although the attack type does not appear here, I suspect that while a missile is "traveling", the countdown is not changed. As a result, closer ranges means higher rates of fire. Seb76 07:36, 5 July 2009 (EDT) ''		:::''Edit: Although the attack type does not appear here, I suspect that while a missile is "traveling", the countdown is not changed. As a result, closer ranges means higher rates of fire. Seb76 07:36, 5 July 2009 (EDT) ''
	::Note that Seb did not provide the code offset in the executable. Personally I don't think the firing rate is based on range. My tests show a strong correlation with firing rate on Attack Mode (for missiles only), and no correlation with range. I did ask Seb to check if the same algorithm was used for XCom craft but he hasn't replied yet. I can't find where from, but elsewhere I've come to the conclusion that the XCom craft firing rate formula is the same, except it doesn't have the speed-up factor based on Difficulty Level. Zombie it would be great if you could check this, and also check for TFTD. However based on the test data, it looks like it. Or put another way, if we assume XCom weaons use the same formula as the UFOs, then the "firing rate" factors for the XCom weapons are as noted in my draft article. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 14:03, 11 December 2009 (EST)		::Note that Seb did not provide the code offset in the executable. Personally I don't think the firing rate is based on range. My tests show a strong correlation with firing rate on Attack Mode (for missiles only), and no correlation with range. I did ask Seb to check if the same algorithm was used for XCom craft but he hasn't replied yet. I can't find where from, but elsewhere I've come to the conclusion that the XCom craft firing rate formula is the same, except it doesn't have the speed-up factor based on Difficulty Level. Zombie it would be great if you could check this, and also check for TFTD. However based on the test data, it looks like it. Or put another way, if we assume XCom weaons use the same formula as the UFOs, then the "firing rate" factors for the XCom weapons are as noted in my draft article. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 14:03, 11 December 2009 (EST)

			== Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates) ==

			<table {{StdCenterTable}} class="sortable">
			<tr {{StdDescTable_Heading}}>
			<th width="150" align="left">Armament</th><th width="90">Damage</th><th width="120">Range (km)</th><th width="100">Accuracy</th><th width="160">Reload Time (s)</th><th width="80">Shots</th>
			<th width="80">D×A/RT</th>
			<th width="100">D×A/RT×Rg</th>
			<th width="80">D×S×A</th>
			</tr>
			<tr><td align="left">Craft Gas Cannon</td><td>15</td><td>8</td><td>25%</td><td>3</td><td>200</td><td>1.25</td><td> </td><td>750</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">AJAX Agg</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>24</td><td>6</td><td>1.75</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">AJAX Std</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>36</td><td>6</td><td>1.31</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">AJAX Cau</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>48</td><td>6</td><td>0.88</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Agg</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>36</td><td>3</td><td>2.44</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Std</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>54</td><td>3</td><td>1.83</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Cau</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>72</td><td>3</td><td>1.22</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">Gauss Cannon</td><td>90</td><td>20</td><td>35%</td><td>18</td><td>50</td><td>1.75</td><td> </td><td>1575</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">Sonic Oscillator</td><td>150</td><td>55</td><td>50%</td><td>18</td><td>100</td><td>4.17</td><td> </td><td>7500</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Agg</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>24</td><td>2</td><td>8.33</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Std</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>36</td><td>2</td><td>6.25</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>
			<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Cau</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>48</td><td>2</td><td>4.17</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>
			</table>

Spike: /* USO observed rates of fire */ Random firing interval decompile

2009-12-11T19:03:52Z

USO observed rates of fire: Random firing interval decompile

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 11 December 2009
Line 84:		Line 84:
	:::''I don't see any effects from changing the game executable XCom craft weapon data firing interval offsets (starting at offset 0x6fb18 in WinCE geoscape.exe). I don't see it either for missile-type weapons nor gun-type weapons. I do see an RoF effect when changing offset 0x10 of UFOs in the craft data at 0x6f9a8. This affects the built-in weapons of UFOs only, and is not used for XCom craft. My conclusion is that the RoFs values in the craft weapon data structure for XCom craft weapons are ignored, that the actual values are hard coded elsewhere in the executable, and are proportional to the values given above at Observed Rates of Fire. The only effect of hacking these craft data weapon values is to change what is listed in the in-game UFOPaedia; there is no actual effect [in combat].''		:::''I don't see any effects from changing the game executable XCom craft weapon data firing interval offsets (starting at offset 0x6fb18 in WinCE geoscape.exe). I don't see it either for missile-type weapons nor gun-type weapons. I do see an RoF effect when changing offset 0x10 of UFOs in the craft data at 0x6f9a8. This affects the built-in weapons of UFOs only, and is not used for XCom craft. My conclusion is that the RoFs values in the craft weapon data structure for XCom craft weapons are ignored, that the actual values are hard coded elsewhere in the executable, and are proportional to the values given above at Observed Rates of Fire. The only effect of hacking these craft data weapon values is to change what is listed in the in-game UFOPaedia; there is no actual effect [in combat].''
	::I will try to find the comment from Seb76 based on his decompile of the EU executable. By the way, Zombie, how do you compute a TFTD code location based on the EU code location? I thought the program was recompiled so the offsets are essentially randomly different between the two programs? [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 13:35, 11 December 2009 (EST)		::I will try to find the comment from Seb76 based on his decompile of the EU executable. By the way, Zombie, how do you compute a TFTD code location based on the EU code location? I thought the program was recompiled so the offsets are essentially randomly different between the two programs? [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 13:35, 11 December 2009 (EST)
			:: Here is the relevant discussion from [[Talk:GEOSCAPE.EXE#Craft_type_data]]
			::: ''I'm enclined to agree with the rate of fire theory. A countdown is stored in CRAFT.DAT at offset 0x26 and when it hits 0, the UFO fires. It is reset for the next shot with this formula'':

			tmp = offset10-2*difficultyLevel
			nextShot = RAND(0,tmp)+tmp

			:::''Edit: Although the attack type does not appear here, I suspect that while a missile is "traveling", the countdown is not changed. As a result, closer ranges means higher rates of fire. Seb76 07:36, 5 July 2009 (EDT) ''
			::Note that Seb did not provide the code offset in the executable. Personally I don't think the firing rate is based on range. My tests show a strong correlation with firing rate on Attack Mode (for missiles only), and no correlation with range. I did ask Seb to check if the same algorithm was used for XCom craft but he hasn't replied yet. I can't find where from, but elsewhere I've come to the conclusion that the XCom craft firing rate formula is the same, except it doesn't have the speed-up factor based on Difficulty Level. Zombie it would be great if you could check this, and also check for TFTD. However based on the test data, it looks like it. Or put another way, if we assume XCom weaons use the same formula as the UFOs, then the "firing rate" factors for the XCom weapons are as noted in my draft article. [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 14:03, 11 December 2009 (EST)

Spike: /* USO observed rates of fire */

2009-12-11T18:35:37Z

USO observed rates of fire

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 11 December 2009
Line 81:		Line 81:
	Right, I realize where the base UFO firing rate is (and the values in TFTD are identical to those in EU). But that value is quite meaningless by itself. Let me ask again: where in the EU executable is the ''equation'' which draws these values to formulate the (observed) firing interval. If I know where it is in EU I can look for it in the general area of the TFTD exe to see if there is a difference. Another question: why are we talking about UFO firing intervals while this discussion deals with craft weapon firing intervals? Those two things are probably modeled differently anyway. --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 12:58, 11 December 2009 (EST)		Right, I realize where the base UFO firing rate is (and the values in TFTD are identical to those in EU). But that value is quite meaningless by itself. Let me ask again: where in the EU executable is the ''equation'' which draws these values to formulate the (observed) firing interval. If I know where it is in EU I can look for it in the general area of the TFTD exe to see if there is a difference. Another question: why are we talking about UFO firing intervals while this discussion deals with craft weapon firing intervals? Those two things are probably modeled differently anyway. --[[User:Zombie\|Zombie]] 12:58, 11 December 2009 (EST)
	:The conversation sprouted naturally from the previous one :). Seriously: the subjects are naturally linked. X-COM craft weapons have different firing rates than actually declared in the UFOPaedia, ergo, their expected effectiveness is different from what the formulae involving the multiplicand RT (Reload Time) seem to suggest in this talk's content page. If they were recalculated using the new data, the results would be different. However, the results, changed or not, bear no significance if they aren't contrasted with USO weapon data, and perhaps X-COM craft's defences as well, in order to come up with a generalised formula for the outcome of any dogfight possible (the variables being the X-COM craft's weapons, the USO being intercepted and possibly the X-COM craft as well). Now, this may seem a bit absurd-ish, since it's obvious that, for instance, any craft with a Sonic Oscillator will down any USO with the exception of the Dreadnought, without taking damage, but the question becomes relevant in cases like mine, where the Sonic Oscillator is, intentionally or not, unavailable. D.U.P. Head vs. P.W.T. Cannon performances are pretty much unexplored. [[User:mingos\|mingos]]		:The conversation sprouted naturally from the previous one :). Seriously: the subjects are naturally linked. X-COM craft weapons have different firing rates than actually declared in the UFOPaedia, ergo, their expected effectiveness is different from what the formulae involving the multiplicand RT (Reload Time) seem to suggest in this talk's content page. If they were recalculated using the new data, the results would be different. However, the results, changed or not, bear no significance if they aren't contrasted with USO weapon data, and perhaps X-COM craft's defences as well, in order to come up with a generalised formula for the outcome of any dogfight possible (the variables being the X-COM craft's weapons, the USO being intercepted and possibly the X-COM craft as well). Now, this may seem a bit absurd-ish, since it's obvious that, for instance, any craft with a Sonic Oscillator will down any USO with the exception of the Dreadnought, without taking damage, but the question becomes relevant in cases like mine, where the Sonic Oscillator is, intentionally or not, unavailable. D.U.P. Head vs. P.W.T. Cannon performances are pretty much unexplored. [[User:mingos\|mingos]]
			::From what I remember Seb has discovered that the algorithm is the same, but the source of the RoF values is different, for UFOs vs XCom craft. Here's what I said in the article I linked to:
			:::''I don't see any effects from changing the game executable XCom craft weapon data firing interval offsets (starting at offset 0x6fb18 in WinCE geoscape.exe). I don't see it either for missile-type weapons nor gun-type weapons. I do see an RoF effect when changing offset 0x10 of UFOs in the craft data at 0x6f9a8. This affects the built-in weapons of UFOs only, and is not used for XCom craft. My conclusion is that the RoFs values in the craft weapon data structure for XCom craft weapons are ignored, that the actual values are hard coded elsewhere in the executable, and are proportional to the values given above at Observed Rates of Fire. The only effect of hacking these craft data weapon values is to change what is listed in the in-game UFOPaedia; there is no actual effect [in combat].''
			::I will try to find the comment from Seb76 based on his decompile of the EU executable. By the way, Zombie, how do you compute a TFTD code location based on the EU code location? I thought the program was recompiled so the offsets are essentially randomly different between the two programs? [[User:Spike\|Spike]] 13:35, 11 December 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 11 December 2009
Line 101:		Line 101:
	<th width="150" align="left">Armament</th><th width="90">Damage</th><th width="120">Range (km)</th><th width="100">Accuracy</th><th width="160">Reload Time (s)</th><th width="80">Shots</th>		<th width="150" align="left">Armament</th><th width="90">Damage</th><th width="120">Range (km)</th><th width="100">Accuracy</th><th width="160">Reload Time (s)</th><th width="80">Shots</th>
	<th width="80">D×A/RT</th>		<th width="80">D×A/RT</th>
	<th width="100">~~D×A~~/~~RT×Rg~~</th>		<th width="100">Avg dmg/shot</th>
	<th width="80">D×S×A</th>		<th width="80">D×S×A</th>
	</tr>		</tr>
	<tr><td align="left">Craft Gas Cannon</td><td>15</td><td>8</td><td>25%</td><td>3</td><td>200</td><td>1.25</td><td> </td><td>750</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">Craft Gas Cannon</td><td>15</td><td>8</td><td>25%</td><td>3</td><td>200</td><td>1.25</td><td>3.75</td><td>750</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">AJAX Agg</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>24</td><td>6</td><td>1.75</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">AJAX Agg</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>24</td><td>6</td><td>1.75</td><td>42</td><td>252</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">AJAX Std</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>36</td><td>6</td><td>1.17</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">AJAX Std</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>36</td><td>6</td><td>1.17</td><td>42</td><td>252</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">AJAX Cau</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>48</td><td>6</td><td>0.88</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">AJAX Cau</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>48</td><td>6</td><td>0.88</td><td>42</td><td>252</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Agg</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>36</td><td>3</td><td>2.44</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Agg</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>36</td><td>3</td><td>2.44</td><td>88</td><td>264</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Std</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>54</td><td>3</td><td>1.63</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Std</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>54</td><td>3</td><td>1.63</td><td>88</td><td>264</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Cau</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>72</td><td>3</td><td>1.22</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Cau</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>72</td><td>3</td><td>1.22</td><td>88</td><td>264</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">Gauss Cannon</td><td>90</td><td>20</td><td>35%</td><td>18</td><td>50</td><td>1.75</td><td> </td><td>1575</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">Gauss Cannon</td><td>90</td><td>20</td><td>35%</td><td>18</td><td>50</td><td>1.75</td><td>31.5</td><td>1575</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">Sonic Oscillator</td><td>150</td><td>55</td><td>50%</td><td>18</td><td>100</td><td>4.17</td><td> </td><td>7500</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">Sonic Oscillator</td><td>150</td><td>55</td><td>50%</td><td>18</td><td>100</td><td>4.17</td><td>75</td><td>7500</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Agg</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>24</td><td>2</td><td>8.33</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Agg</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>24</td><td>2</td><td>8.33</td><td>200</td><td>400</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Std</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>36</td><td>2</td><td>5.56</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Std</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>36</td><td>2</td><td>5.56</td><td>200</td><td>400</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Cau</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>48</td><td>2</td><td>4.17</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Cau</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>48</td><td>2</td><td>4.17</td><td>200</td><td>400</td></tr>
	</table>		</table>

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, 11 December 2009
Line 94:		Line 94:

	== Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates) ==		== Sub Weapon Comparison table (assuming EU observed firing rates) ==

			This table is based on the assumption that TFTD craft weapons have 'equivalent' EU craft weapons, and that the relative ''actual'' firing rates (relative to the Cannon/Gas Cannon) are the same in TFTD as ''observed'' in EU.

	<table {{StdCenterTable}} class="sortable">		<table {{StdCenterTable}} class="sortable">
Line 104:		Line 106:
	<tr><td align="left">Craft Gas Cannon</td><td>15</td><td>8</td><td>25%</td><td>3</td><td>200</td><td>1.25</td><td> </td><td>750</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">Craft Gas Cannon</td><td>15</td><td>8</td><td>25%</td><td>3</td><td>200</td><td>1.25</td><td> </td><td>750</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">AJAX Agg</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>24</td><td>6</td><td>1.75</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">AJAX Agg</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>24</td><td>6</td><td>1.75</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">AJAX Std</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>36</td><td>6</td><td>1.31</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">AJAX Std</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>36</td><td>6</td><td>1.17</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">AJAX Cau</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>48</td><td>6</td><td>0.88</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">AJAX Cau</td><td>60</td><td>32</td><td>70%</td><td>48</td><td>6</td><td>0.88</td><td> </td><td>252</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Agg</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>36</td><td>3</td><td>2.44</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Agg</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>36</td><td>3</td><td>2.44</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Std</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>54</td><td>3</td><td>1.83</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Std</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>54</td><td>3</td><td>1.63</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Cau</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>72</td><td>3</td><td>1.22</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">D.U.P. Head Cau</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>80%</td><td>72</td><td>3</td><td>1.22</td><td> </td><td>264</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">Gauss Cannon</td><td>90</td><td>20</td><td>35%</td><td>18</td><td>50</td><td>1.75</td><td> </td><td>1575</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">Gauss Cannon</td><td>90</td><td>20</td><td>35%</td><td>18</td><td>50</td><td>1.75</td><td> </td><td>1575</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">Sonic Oscillator</td><td>150</td><td>55</td><td>50%</td><td>18</td><td>100</td><td>4.17</td><td> </td><td>7500</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">Sonic Oscillator</td><td>150</td><td>55</td><td>50%</td><td>18</td><td>100</td><td>4.17</td><td> </td><td>7500</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Agg</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>24</td><td>2</td><td>8.33</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Agg</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>24</td><td>2</td><td>8.33</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Std</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>36</td><td>2</td><td>6.25</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Std</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>36</td><td>2</td><td>5.56</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>
	<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Cau</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>48</td><td>2</td><td>4.17</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>		<tr><td align="left">P.W.T. Cannon Cau</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>100%</td><td>48</td><td>2</td><td>4.17</td><td> </td><td>400</td></tr>
	</table>		</table>