Talk:Psionic (Long War) - Revision history

Binkyuk at 11:39, 17 July 2014

2014-07-17T11:39:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 17 July 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Hm, ther's prolly a better way to format that. It doesn't read very well; looks too much like a subnote for that one ability each. --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 07:35, 17 July 2014 (EDT)		Hm, ther's prolly a better way to format that. It doesn't read very well; looks too much like a subnote for that one ability each. --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 07:35, 17 July 2014 (EDT)
			:Normally we have a section for the ability descriptions and another "tactical advice" (or similar) section that expands on pros and cons, tips and combos. That'd probably solve this problem. [[User:Binkyuk\|Binkyuk]] ([[User talk:Binkyuk\|talk]]) 07:39, 17 July 2014 (EDT)

Xuncu at 11:35, 17 July 2014

2014-07-17T11:35:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:35, 17 July 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Tested and confirmed (on Beta9 at least): multiple soliders can get rift at 2000 PXP, if that specific soldier has MCed an Etherial at any time. 'Glitch': You can't mind-link an Inspired soldier, but you can insprie a Mindlinked one. A MCer, a Linker, and an Inspirerer are needed. Another linker and a mind-frayer helps: Linkers bond to MCer and Frayer (or two), Inspire boosts the Mcer and Frayer(s). Frayers weaken the Etherial's will, MCer can MC for Rift requirement. Naturally, the psionic armors really help. Feel free to write that up in a more coherent manner. --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 07:26, 14 July 2014 (EDT)		Tested and confirmed (on Beta9 at least): multiple soliders can get rift at 2000 PXP, if that specific soldier has MCed an Etherial at any time. 'Glitch': You can't mind-link an Inspired soldier, but you can insprie a Mindlinked one. A MCer, a Linker, and an Inspirerer are needed. Another linker and a mind-frayer helps: Linkers bond to MCer and Frayer (or two), Inspire boosts the Mcer and Frayer(s). Frayers weaken the Etherial's will, MCer can MC for Rift requirement. Naturally, the psionic armors really help. Feel free to write that up in a more coherent manner. --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 07:26, 14 July 2014 (EDT)

			Hm, ther's prolly a better way to format that. It doesn't read very well; looks too much like a subnote for that one ability each. --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 07:35, 17 July 2014 (EDT)

Xuncu at 11:26, 14 July 2014

2014-07-14T11:26:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:26, 14 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? The reason why I'm asking is because once you start getting separate pages for the abilities then you need pages for all abilities and that's a lot of work. And there are other ways to create links to abilities descriptions. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)		Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? The reason why I'm asking is because once you start getting separate pages for the abilities then you need pages for all abilities and that's a lot of work. And there are other ways to create links to abilities descriptions. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)
	:Have it all here for now. If we end up with enough content to warrant a page per ability, we can spin them off later. [[User:Binkyuk\|Binkyuk]] ([[User talk:Binkyuk\|talk]]) 05:25, 13 June 2014 (EDT)		:Have it all here for now. If we end up with enough content to warrant a page per ability, we can spin them off later. [[User:Binkyuk\|Binkyuk]] ([[User talk:Binkyuk\|talk]]) 05:25, 13 June 2014 (EDT)

			Tested and confirmed (on Beta9 at least): multiple soliders can get rift at 2000 PXP, if that specific soldier has MCed an Etherial at any time. 'Glitch': You can't mind-link an Inspired soldier, but you can insprie a Mindlinked one. A MCer, a Linker, and an Inspirerer are needed. Another linker and a mind-frayer helps: Linkers bond to MCer and Frayer (or two), Inspire boosts the Mcer and Frayer(s). Frayers weaken the Etherial's will, MCer can MC for Rift requirement. Naturally, the psionic armors really help. Feel free to write that up in a more coherent manner. --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 07:26, 14 July 2014 (EDT)

Binkyuk at 09:25, 13 June 2014

2014-06-13T09:25:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 13 June 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? The reason why I'm asking is because once you start getting separate pages for the abilities then you need pages for all abilities and that's a lot of work. And there are other ways to create links to abilities descriptions. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)		Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? The reason why I'm asking is because once you start getting separate pages for the abilities then you need pages for all abilities and that's a lot of work. And there are other ways to create links to abilities descriptions. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)
			:Have it all here for now. If we end up with enough content to warrant a page per ability, we can spin them off later. [[User:Binkyuk\|Binkyuk]] ([[User talk:Binkyuk\|talk]]) 05:25, 13 June 2014 (EDT)

Hobbes at 19:43, 11 June 2014

2014-06-11T19:43:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 11 June 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)		Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? The reason why I'm asking is because once you start getting separate pages for the abilities then you need pages for all abilities and that's a lot of work. And there are other ways to create links to abilities descriptions. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)

Hobbes: Created page with "Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages suc..."

2014-06-11T19:40:30Z

Created page with "Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages suc..."

New page

Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? [[User:Hobbes|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:26, 14 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? The reason why I'm asking is because once you start getting separate pages for the abilities then you need pages for all abilities and that's a lot of work. And there are other ways to create links to abilities descriptions. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)		Do we need to have separate pages for the abilities that consist only of a couple of lines of text or it's better to centralize all the relevant info on the relevant pages such as this one? The reason why I'm asking is because once you start getting separate pages for the abilities then you need pages for all abilities and that's a lot of work. And there are other ways to create links to abilities descriptions. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:40, 11 June 2014 (EDT)
	:Have it all here for now. If we end up with enough content to warrant a page per ability, we can spin them off later. [[User:Binkyuk\|Binkyuk]] ([[User talk:Binkyuk\|talk]]) 05:25, 13 June 2014 (EDT)		:Have it all here for now. If we end up with enough content to warrant a page per ability, we can spin them off later. [[User:Binkyuk\|Binkyuk]] ([[User talk:Binkyuk\|talk]]) 05:25, 13 June 2014 (EDT)

			Tested and confirmed (on Beta9 at least): multiple soliders can get rift at 2000 PXP, if that specific soldier has MCed an Etherial at any time. 'Glitch': You can't mind-link an Inspired soldier, but you can insprie a Mindlinked one. A MCer, a Linker, and an Inspirerer are needed. Another linker and a mind-frayer helps: Linkers bond to MCer and Frayer (or two), Inspire boosts the Mcer and Frayer(s). Frayers weaken the Etherial's will, MCer can MC for Rift requirement. Naturally, the psionic armors really help. Feel free to write that up in a more coherent manner. --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 07:26, 14 July 2014 (EDT)