Talk:Inventory TU Table - Revision history

Volutar: /* Info from EXE */

2011-04-08T13:19:15Z

Info from EXE

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 8 April 2011
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Section 1 is unused, though it somehow correlates with legs. Maybe it meant to be a Snakeman "Tail"?		Section 1 is unused, though it somehow correlates with legs. Maybe it meant to be a Snakeman "Tail"?
	Considering second unused inventory layout I can presume they planned more than 2 of them, to use them for different humanoid races. Presumably for Mind Control with inventory screen. Though it would require for complex function for realistic AI item placement (instead of universal item cell 2).		Considering second unused inventory layout I can presume they planned more than 2 of them, to use them for different humanoid races. Presumably for Mind Control with inventory screen. Though it would require for complex function for realistic AI item placement (instead of universal item cell 2).
			--[[User:Volutar\|Volutar]] 09:19, 8 April 2011 (EDT)

Volutar at 14:05, 7 April 2011

2011-04-07T14:05:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 7 April 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	There is table for item movement TUs cost between different inventory sections:		There is table for item movement TUs cost between different inventory sections:

	.data:0046B97C		.data:0046B97C
	db 0, 16, 8, 8, 10, 10, 12, 12, 20, 12; 0 - from ground		db 0, 16, 8, 8, 10, 10, 12, 12, 20, 12; 0 - from ground
	db 10, 0, 6, 6, 10, 10, 10, 10, 18, 10; 1 - from unknown		db 10, 0, 6, 6, 10, 10, 10, 10, 18, 10; 1 - from unknown

Volutar at 14:02, 7 April 2011

2011-04-07T14:02:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 7 April 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Inventory entries seem to be stored in the exe (CE version) starting with the offset 0x6B97D.--[[User:Kyrub\|Kyrub]] 17:42, 31 August 2008 (PDT)		Inventory entries seem to be stored in the exe (CE version) starting with the offset 0x6B97D.--[[User:Kyrub\|Kyrub]] 17:42, 31 August 2008 (PDT)

			== Info from EXE ==

			There is table for item movement TUs cost between different inventory sections:

			.data:0046B97C
			db 0, 16, 8, 8, 10, 10, 12, 12, 20, 12; 0 - from ground
			db 10, 0, 6, 6, 10, 10, 10, 10, 18, 10; 1 - from unknown
			db 2, 4, 0, 4, 8, 10, 10, 10, 14, 8; 2 - from right hand
			db 2, 4, 4, 0, 10, 8, 10, 10, 14, 8; 3 - from left hand
			db 6, 10, 4, 6, 0, 10, 10, 10, 18, 10; 4 - from right leg
			db 6, 10, 6, 4, 10, 0, 10, 10, 18, 10; 5 - from left leg
			db 4, 9, 3, 3, 12, 12, 0, 8, 16, 10; 6 - from right shoulder
			db 4, 9, 3, 3, 12, 12, 8, 0, 16, 10; 7 - from left shoulder
			db 10, 14, 8, 8, 16, 16, 14, 14, 0, 12; 8 - from backback
			db 6, 6, 4, 4, 10, 10, 12, 12, 16, 0; 9 - from belt

			Y is "from" and X is "to".

			Section 1 is unused, though it somehow correlates with legs. Maybe it meant to be a Snakeman "Tail"?
			Considering second unused inventory layout I can presume they planned more than 2 of them, to use them for different humanoid races. Presumably for Mind Control with inventory screen. Though it would require for complex function for realistic AI item placement (instead of universal item cell 2).

Kyrub at 00:42, 1 September 2008

2008-09-01T00:42:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 1 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It takes more time units to go from one hand to the other then from shoulder to hand? That totally doesn't make sense. I'm not saying the table is wrong, I'm saying the makers of the game weren't thinking right. meh. [[User:Vicarious\|Vicarious]] 01:16, 18 Oct 2005 (PDT)		It takes more time units to go from one hand to the other then from shoulder to hand? That totally doesn't make sense. I'm not saying the table is wrong, I'm saying the makers of the game weren't thinking right. meh. [[User:Vicarious\|Vicarious]] 01:16, 18 Oct 2005 (PDT)

			Inventory entries seem to be stored in the exe (CE version) starting with the offset 0x6B97D.--[[User:Kyrub\|Kyrub]] 17:42, 31 August 2008 (PDT)

Vicarious: silly

2005-10-18T08:16:24Z

silly

New page

It takes more time units to go from one hand to the other then from shoulder to hand? That totally doesn't make sense. I'm not saying the table is wrong, I'm saying the makers of the game weren't thinking right. meh. [[User:Vicarious|Vicarious]] 01:16, 18 Oct 2005 (PDT)