Talk:Gill Man - Revision history

Magic9mushroom: Magic9mushroom moved page Talk:Gillman to Talk:Gill Man: formatting used in battlescape and title of UFOpedia entry

2020-04-19T01:56:04Z

Magic9mushroom moved page Talk:Gillman to Talk:Gill Man: formatting used in battlescape and title of UFOpedia entry

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 19 April 2020
(No difference)

Magic9mushroom: /* Name */ typo

2020-01-16T03:01:55Z

Name: typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 16 January 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Name ==		== Name ==

	The "Gillmen" vs. "Gill ~~Man~~" thing is pretty schizophrenic in-game; every UFOpedia entry (their own, their autopsy, and the Xarquid live and autopsy) calls them "Gillmen", but everything else (including the ''title'' of their UFOpedia entry) calls them "Gill Men". Any suggestions about which one we should use as the article name (with a redirect from the other one)? [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] ([[User talk:Magic9mushroom\|talk]]) 04:01, 16 January 2020 (CET)		The "Gillmen" vs. "Gill Men" thing is pretty schizophrenic in-game; every UFOpedia entry (their own, their autopsy, and the Xarquid live and autopsy) calls them "Gillmen", but everything else (including the ''title'' of their UFOpedia entry) calls them "Gill Men". Any suggestions about which one we should use as the article name (with a redirect from the other one)? [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] ([[User talk:Magic9mushroom\|talk]]) 04:01, 16 January 2020 (CET)

Magic9mushroom: /* Name */ new section

2020-01-16T03:01:27Z

Name: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 16 January 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== "Rectum? Damn near killed'em!" ==		== "Rectum? Damn near killed'em!" ==
	Eyyy, if some parts of alien abduction lore turned out to be true, whoever wrote that might've been right, heh heh~ --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 06:15, 31 January 2015 (EST)		Eyyy, if some parts of alien abduction lore turned out to be true, whoever wrote that might've been right, heh heh~ --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 06:15, 31 January 2015 (EST)

			== Name ==

			The "Gillmen" vs. "Gill Man" thing is pretty schizophrenic in-game; every UFOpedia entry (their own, their autopsy, and the Xarquid live and autopsy) calls them "Gillmen", but everything else (including the ''title'' of their UFOpedia entry) calls them "Gill Men". Any suggestions about which one we should use as the article name (with a redirect from the other one)? [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] ([[User talk:Magic9mushroom\|talk]]) 04:01, 16 January 2020 (CET)

Xuncu at 11:15, 31 January 2015

2015-01-31T11:15:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 31 January 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Psi Attack Strength goes up as (Psi Strength x Psi Skill). The Gillman Commander only has MC Strength 35, which is far below a Sectoid Leader's 50. As such, even an Ethereal Soldier with 50 Psi Strength and 40 Psi Skill has better Psi attacks. As I said in the edit summary, a Gillman Commander is weaker at psi than ANY psi-active alien in Enemy Unknown, and only really starts to become an issue once your troops are actually IN the Dreadnought. As such, I stand by "only average". [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 04:49, 12 February 2012 (EST)		:Psi Attack Strength goes up as (Psi Strength x Psi Skill). The Gillman Commander only has MC Strength 35, which is far below a Sectoid Leader's 50. As such, even an Ethereal Soldier with 50 Psi Strength and 40 Psi Skill has better Psi attacks. As I said in the edit summary, a Gillman Commander is weaker at psi than ANY psi-active alien in Enemy Unknown, and only really starts to become an issue once your troops are actually IN the Dreadnought. As such, I stand by "only average". [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 04:49, 12 February 2012 (EST)

			== "Rectum? Damn near killed'em!" ==
			Eyyy, if some parts of alien abduction lore turned out to be true, whoever wrote that might've been right, heh heh~ --[[User:Xuncu\|Xuncu]] ([[User talk:Xuncu\|talk]]) 06:15, 31 January 2015 (EST)

Magic9mushroom at 09:49, 12 February 2012

2012-02-12T09:49:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 12 February 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Looking at [[Alien Stats (TFTD)]], the core MC Skill of a Gillman Commander is 50, which is equal to the skill of Aquatoid Commanders and Ethereal Commanders. Of course, not as strong as the Sectoid Commander's 60. Certainly not to be underestimated when playing a superhuman game. If they do have one failing though, it will be that they only have 1 MC capable unit. [[User:NKF\|NKF]] 03:00, 12 February 2012 (EST)		Looking at [[Alien Stats (TFTD)]], the core MC Skill of a Gillman Commander is 50, which is equal to the skill of Aquatoid Commanders and Ethereal Commanders. Of course, not as strong as the Sectoid Commander's 60. Certainly not to be underestimated when playing a superhuman game. If they do have one failing though, it will be that they only have 1 MC capable unit. [[User:NKF\|NKF]] 03:00, 12 February 2012 (EST)

			:Psi Attack Strength goes up as (Psi Strength x Psi Skill). The Gillman Commander only has MC Strength 35, which is far below a Sectoid Leader's 50. As such, even an Ethereal Soldier with 50 Psi Strength and 40 Psi Skill has better Psi attacks. As I said in the edit summary, a Gillman Commander is weaker at psi than ANY psi-active alien in Enemy Unknown, and only really starts to become an issue once your troops are actually IN the Dreadnought. As such, I stand by "only average". [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 04:49, 12 February 2012 (EST)

NKF: Gillman MC Skills

2012-02-12T08:00:09Z

Gillman MC Skills

New page

== Gillman MC Skills ==

Looking at [[Alien Stats (TFTD)]], the core MC Skill of a Gillman Commander is 50, which is equal to the skill of Aquatoid Commanders and Ethereal Commanders. Of course, not as strong as the Sectoid Commander's 60. Certainly not to be underestimated when playing a superhuman game. If they do have one failing though, it will be that they only have 1 MC capable unit. [[User:NKF|NKF]] 03:00, 12 February 2012 (EST)