Talk:Displacer /Sonic - Revision history

Morgan525: /* Version Check! */

2012-09-25T03:02:58Z

Version Check!

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 25 September 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00 with 100 shots of ammo.		.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00 with 100 shots of ammo.
	: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside.		: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside.
	I've checked CE, v2.0, and v2.1. It seems that the in-game statics for the Displacer/Sonic are incorrect. There, the damage is stated to be 130 but, as you can see from the actual code, the damage is 110. Even that isn't logical: If the Displacer is armed with a Craft's Sonic Oscillator the damage should be 150.[[User:Morgan525\|~~Morgan525~~]] 10:04, 10 August 2012 (EDT)		I've checked CE, v2.0, and v2.1. It seems that the in-game statics for the Displacer/Sonic are incorrect. There, the damage is stated to be 130 but, as you can see from the actual code, the damage is 110. Even that isn't logical: If the Displacer is armed with a Craft's Sonic Oscillator the damage should be 150.[[User:Morgan525\|Tycho]] 10:04, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

	: So it's just the ufopaedia entry that's showing the wrong stats. Fair enough, as from actual use I always felt it wasn't stronger than the sonic cannon on a shot-by-shot basis. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 15:32, 10 August 2012 (EDT)		: So it's just the ufopaedia entry that's showing the wrong stats. Fair enough, as from actual use I always felt it wasn't stronger than the sonic cannon on a shot-by-shot basis. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 15:32, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

NKF: /* Version Check! */

2012-08-10T19:32:50Z

Version Check!

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 10 August 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside.		: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside.
	I've checked CE, v2.0, and v2.1. It seems that the in-game statics for the Displacer/Sonic are incorrect. There, the damage is stated to be 130 but, as you can see from the actual code, the damage is 110. Even that isn't logical: If the Displacer is armed with a Craft's Sonic Oscillator the damage should be 150.[[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 10:04, 10 August 2012 (EDT)		I've checked CE, v2.0, and v2.1. It seems that the in-game statics for the Displacer/Sonic are incorrect. There, the damage is stated to be 130 but, as you can see from the actual code, the damage is 110. Even that isn't logical: If the Displacer is armed with a Craft's Sonic Oscillator the damage should be 150.[[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 10:04, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

			: So it's just the ufopaedia entry that's showing the wrong stats. Fair enough, as from actual use I always felt it wasn't stronger than the sonic cannon on a shot-by-shot basis. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 15:32, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

Morgan525: /* Version Check! */

2012-08-10T14:04:00Z

Version Check!

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 10 August 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The CE version stats are exactly the same as the hovertank/plasma:		The CE version stats are exactly the same as the hovertank/plasma:
	.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00 with 100 shots of ammo.		.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00 with 100 shots of ammo.
	: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside. [[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 06:53, 10 August 2012 (EDT)		: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside.
			I've checked CE, v2.0, and v2.1. It seems that the in-game statics for the Displacer/Sonic are incorrect. There, the damage is stated to be 130 but, as you can see from the actual code, the damage is 110. Even that isn't logical: If the Displacer is armed with a Craft's Sonic Oscillator the damage should be 150.[[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 10:04, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

Morgan525: /* Version Check! */

2012-08-10T10:56:15Z

Version Check!

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 10 August 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	The CE version stats are exactly the same as the hovertank/plasma:		The CE version stats are exactly the same as the hovertank/plasma:
	.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00		.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00 with 100 shots of ammo.
	: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside [[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 06:53, 10 August 2012 (EDT)		: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside. [[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 06:53, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

Morgan525: /* Version Check! */

2012-08-10T10:54:49Z

Version Check!

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:54, 10 August 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The CE version stats are exactly the same as the hovertank/plasma:		The CE version stats are exactly the same as the hovertank/plasma:
	.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00		.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00
	[[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 06:53, 10 August 2012 (EDT)		: Armor is 130 all around except 100 for the underside [[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 06:53, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

Morgan525: /* Version Check! */

2012-08-10T10:53:40Z

Version Check!

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 10 August 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Since it seems there's different opinions on what the turret stats are, I think we need a version check to compare the stats. I know the previous edit of 130 damage matches with my fresh install of TFTD for Dos + the v2 update. Also, something which has been bothering me for a while, the ammo is 100, not 99. Anyone with unedited copies of the CE and PSX versions able to verify their values? -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 03:21, 10 August 2012 (EDT)		Since it seems there's different opinions on what the turret stats are, I think we need a version check to compare the stats. I know the previous edit of 130 damage matches with my fresh install of TFTD for Dos + the v2 update. Also, something which has been bothering me for a while, the ammo is 100, not 99. Anyone with unedited copies of the CE and PSX versions able to verify their values? -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 03:21, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

			The CE version stats are exactly the same as the hovertank/plasma:
			.data:0047799C: 04 00 24 00 6E 00 56 00 1E 00 00 00 00 00 64 00 3C 00 00 00
			[[User:Morgan525\|Morgan525]] 06:53, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

NKF: /* Version Check! */

2012-08-10T07:29:23Z

Version Check!

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 10 August 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Version Check! ==		== Version Check! ==

	Since it seems there's different opinions on what the turret stats are, I think we need a version check to compare the stats. I know the previous edit of 130 matches with my fresh install of TFTD for Dos + the v2 update. Anyone with unedited copies of the CE and PSX versions able to verify their values? -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 03:21, 10 August 2012 (EDT)		Since it seems there's different opinions on what the turret stats are, I think we need a version check to compare the stats. I know the previous edit of 130 damage matches with my fresh install of TFTD for Dos + the v2 update. Also, something which has been bothering me for a while, the ammo is 100, not 99. Anyone with unedited copies of the CE and PSX versions able to verify their values? -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 03:21, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

NKF: /* Version Check! */ new section

2012-08-10T07:21:08Z

Version Check!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:21, 10 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:

	: Depends on how you look at it. The Magnetic Ion Armor does do better from the front, but as a whole the displacer does have 130 all-round armour, which does offer better overall protection from areas that Magnetic Ion Armour is most vulnerable. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 12:19, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: Depends on how you look at it. The Magnetic Ion Armor does do better from the front, but as a whole the displacer does have 130 all-round armour, which does offer better overall protection from areas that Magnetic Ion Armour is most vulnerable. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 12:19, 6 March 2012 (EST)

			== Version Check! ==

			Since it seems there's different opinions on what the turret stats are, I think we need a version check to compare the stats. I know the previous edit of 130 matches with my fresh install of TFTD for Dos + the v2 update. Anyone with unedited copies of the CE and PSX versions able to verify their values? -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 03:21, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

NKF at 17:19, 6 March 2012

2012-03-06T17:19:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 6 March 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Superior to Magnetic Ion Armour? The front plate is definitively weaker, and it lacks the MIA's 10% resistance to Sonic weaponry making the back pretty close to even. It's a little iffy. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 06:45, 6 March 2012 (EST)		Superior to Magnetic Ion Armour? The front plate is definitively weaker, and it lacks the MIA's 10% resistance to Sonic weaponry making the back pretty close to even. It's a little iffy. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 06:45, 6 March 2012 (EST)

	: Depends on how you look at it. The Magnetic Ion Armor does do better from the front, but as a whole the displacer does have 130 all-round armour, which does offer better overall protection. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 12:14, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: Depends on how you look at it. The Magnetic Ion Armor does do better from the front, but as a whole the displacer does have 130 all-round armour, which does offer better overall protection from areas that Magnetic Ion Armour is most vulnerable. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 12:19, 6 March 2012 (EST)

NKF at 17:14, 6 March 2012

2012-03-06T17:14:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 6 March 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Superior to Magnetic Ion Armour? The front plate is definitively weaker, and it lacks the MIA's 10% resistance to Sonic weaponry making the back pretty close to even. It's a little iffy. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 06:45, 6 March 2012 (EST)		Superior to Magnetic Ion Armour? The front plate is definitively weaker, and it lacks the MIA's 10% resistance to Sonic weaponry making the back pretty close to even. It's a little iffy. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 06:45, 6 March 2012 (EST)

	: The Magnetic Ion Armor does do better from the front, but as a whole the displacer does have 130 all-round armour, which does offer better overall protection. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 12:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: Depends on how you look at it. The Magnetic Ion Armor does do better from the front, but as a whole the displacer does have 130 all-round armour, which does offer better overall protection. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 12:14, 6 March 2012 (EST)