Talk:Class Builds (LW2) - Revision history

Abathur at 22:18, 22 April 2017

2017-04-22T22:18:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 22 April 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I agree that discussing specific class builds is highly subjective but the page is placed under Game Guides, and you can't write about what works better if you don't have an opinion based on gameplay experience. To me the challenge here will be to harmonize the content that goes into this page so that several opinions about builds can be displayed together. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)		:I agree that discussing specific class builds is highly subjective but the page is placed under Game Guides, and you can't write about what works better if you don't have an opinion based on gameplay experience. To me the challenge here will be to harmonize the content that goes into this page so that several opinions about builds can be displayed together. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
	::I was more referring to the way Long War 1 did it with tactical advice and sample builds in each of the classes' pages. Having the info there with multiple points of view framed as '''suggestions''' makes more sense then a seperate page that list each class with a single specific build as if there is only one correct way to play a class. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 01:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)		::I was more referring to the way Long War 1 did it with tactical advice and sample builds in each of the classes' pages. Having the info there with multiple points of view framed as '''suggestions''' makes more sense then a seperate page that list each class with a single specific build as if there is only one correct way to play a class. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 01:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
			For some reason I actually think that Tactical sense would be much more viable for the shinobi, maybe because you need to have a fall back option should things go south. I think it gives the shinobi that little bit more survivability in case its compromised earlier than intended or you intend to use the shinobi for some light-assault. Even without tradecraft I feel like the shinobi is still pretty good. [[User:Abathur\|Abathur]] ([[User talk:Abathur\|talk]]) 22:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Mavoc at 01:10, 6 February 2017

2017-02-06T01:10:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 6 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Not sure this section should be part of the wiki. It is highly subjective and would be better placed in each of the class pages. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 05:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)		Not sure this section should be part of the wiki. It is highly subjective and would be better placed in each of the class pages. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 05:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
	:I agree that discussing specific class builds is highly subjective but the page is placed under Game Guides, and you can't write about what works better if you don't have an opinion based on gameplay experience. To me the challenge here will be to harmonize the content that goes into this page so that several opinions about builds can be displayed together. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)		:I agree that discussing specific class builds is highly subjective but the page is placed under Game Guides, and you can't write about what works better if you don't have an opinion based on gameplay experience. To me the challenge here will be to harmonize the content that goes into this page so that several opinions about builds can be displayed together. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
			::I was more referring to the way Long War 1 did it with tactical advice and sample builds in each of the classes' pages. Having the info there with multiple points of view framed as '''suggestions''' makes more sense then a seperate page that list each class with a single specific build as if there is only one correct way to play a class. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 01:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Hobbes at 15:39, 5 February 2017

2017-02-05T15:39:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 5 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Not sure this section should be part of the wiki. It is highly subjective and would be better placed in each of the class pages. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 05:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)		Not sure this section should be part of the wiki. It is highly subjective and would be better placed in each of the class pages. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 05:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
			:I agree that discussing specific class builds is highly subjective but the page is placed under Game Guides, and you can't write about what works better if you don't have an opinion based on gameplay experience. To me the challenge here will be to harmonize the content that goes into this page so that several opinions about builds can be displayed together. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Mavoc: Created page with "Not sure this section should be part of the wiki. It is highly subjective and would be better placed in each of the class pages. --~~~~"

2017-02-05T05:48:19Z

Created page with "Not sure this section should be part of the wiki. It is highly subjective and would be better placed in each of the class pages. --~~~~"

New page

Not sure this section should be part of the wiki. It is highly subjective and would be better placed in each of the class pages. --[[User:Mavoc|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc|talk]]) 05:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 22 April 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I agree that discussing specific class builds is highly subjective but the page is placed under Game Guides, and you can't write about what works better if you don't have an opinion based on gameplay experience. To me the challenge here will be to harmonize the content that goes into this page so that several opinions about builds can be displayed together. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)		:I agree that discussing specific class builds is highly subjective but the page is placed under Game Guides, and you can't write about what works better if you don't have an opinion based on gameplay experience. To me the challenge here will be to harmonize the content that goes into this page so that several opinions about builds can be displayed together. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] ([[User talk:Hobbes\|talk]]) 15:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
	::I was more referring to the way Long War 1 did it with tactical advice and sample builds in each of the classes' pages. Having the info there with multiple points of view framed as '''suggestions''' makes more sense then a seperate page that list each class with a single specific build as if there is only one correct way to play a class. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 01:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)		::I was more referring to the way Long War 1 did it with tactical advice and sample builds in each of the classes' pages. Having the info there with multiple points of view framed as '''suggestions''' makes more sense then a seperate page that list each class with a single specific build as if there is only one correct way to play a class. --[[User:Mavoc\|Mavoc]] ([[User talk:Mavoc\|talk]]) 01:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
			For some reason I actually think that Tactical sense would be much more viable for the shinobi, maybe because you need to have a fall back option should things go south. I think it gives the shinobi that little bit more survivability in case its compromised earlier than intended or you intend to use the shinobi for some light-assault. Even without tradecraft I feel like the shinobi is still pretty good. [[User:Abathur\|Abathur]] ([[User talk:Abathur\|talk]]) 22:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)