Talk:Base Locations (Apocalypse) - Revision history

NKF at 07:41, 1 December 2010

2010-12-01T07:41:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:41, 1 December 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	: Looks like a miscalculation to me. The Apocalypse pages are very lacking when compared against the UFO/TFTD sections as far as up-to-date information is concerned, so I'm quite positive there's lot of little mistakes like this that need to be ironed out. Feel free to make any corrections as you see fit. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 05:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)		: Looks like a miscalculation to me. The Apocalypse pages are very lacking when compared against the UFO/TFTD sections as far as up-to-date information is concerned, so I'm quite positive there's lot of little mistakes like this that need to be ironed out. Feel free to make any corrections as you see fit. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 05:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

			There you go, assuming the prices were correct, the area/cost values should now be correct, give or take the rounding errors. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 07:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

NKF at 05:01, 1 December 2010

2010-12-01T05:01:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:01, 1 December 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	----		----
	Are these base calculations for area correct? On Medium, Warehouse Seven looks to me like 32 units of space (4x8) minus one for the gravlift - but this shows 36. Hades Block is the largest by my calculations, with 6x6 = 36 units of space for building (minus one for lift) - yet Area is listed as 25. Would this make all the area cost calculations incorrect as well? --[[User:Alloutwar\|Alloutwar]] 14:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)		Are these base calculations for area correct? On Medium, Warehouse Seven looks to me like 32 units of space (4x8) minus one for the gravlift - but this shows 36. Hades Block is the largest by my calculations, with 6x6 = 36 units of space for building (minus one for lift) - yet Area is listed as 25. Would this make all the area cost calculations incorrect as well? --[[User:Alloutwar\|Alloutwar]] 14:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

			: Looks like a miscalculation to me. The Apocalypse pages are very lacking when compared against the UFO/TFTD sections as far as up-to-date information is concerned, so I'm quite positive there's lot of little mistakes like this that need to be ironed out. Feel free to make any corrections as you see fit. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 05:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Alloutwar at 14:44, 30 November 2010

2010-11-30T14:44:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 30 November 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: Yeah, with 1 or 2 exceptions, the Slums are not worth buying. They are usually more expensive and the extra space isn't that much. I had already thought about adding which are the most probable bases but i'm only aware in Superhuman. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 05:14, 17 November 2009 (EST)		: Yeah, with 1 or 2 exceptions, the Slums are not worth buying. They are usually more expensive and the extra space isn't that much. I had already thought about adding which are the most probable bases but i'm only aware in Superhuman. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 05:14, 17 November 2009 (EST)

			----
			Are these base calculations for area correct? On Medium, Warehouse Seven looks to me like 32 units of space (4x8) minus one for the gravlift - but this shows 36. Hades Block is the largest by my calculations, with 6x6 = 36 units of space for building (minus one for lift) - yet Area is listed as 25. Would this make all the area cost calculations incorrect as well? --[[User:Alloutwar\|Alloutwar]] 14:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Hobbes at 10:14, 17 November 2009

2009-11-17T10:14:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 17 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	One thing we can add later is to note which layouts are randomly selected for your starting base. Not sure how random the base selection is, as I can only remember getting 3 - 4 common selections on each restart (like Warehouse Two for the superhuman map is almost the default base), but not some others. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 00:46, 17 November 2009 (EST)		One thing we can add later is to note which layouts are randomly selected for your starting base. Not sure how random the base selection is, as I can only remember getting 3 - 4 common selections on each restart (like Warehouse Two for the superhuman map is almost the default base), but not some others. -[[User:NKF\|NKF]] 00:46, 17 November 2009 (EST)

			: Yeah, with 1 or 2 exceptions, the Slums are not worth buying. They are usually more expensive and the extra space isn't that much. I had already thought about adding which are the most probable bases but i'm only aware in Superhuman. [[User:Hobbes\|Hobbes]] 05:14, 17 November 2009 (EST)

NKF: New page: It's nice to see the base layouts laid out like this. Turns out there are a lot of really useful layouts to choose from that can easily be defended, despite requiring the base to be very s...

2009-11-17T05:46:15Z

New page: It's nice to see the base layouts laid out like this. Turns out there are a lot of really useful layouts to choose from that can easily be defended, despite requiring the base to be very s...

New page

It's nice to see the base layouts laid out like this. Turns out there are a lot of really useful layouts to choose from that can easily be defended, despite requiring the base to be very specialized. It's just the large blocks (usually under slums) that don't work very well. Easy level in particular has a lot of small but really nice choices, even the Heavenly Towers slum block looks like it can be split in half down the middle and leave the top half for a repair bay. Wouldn't want to protect it from an air skirmish though!

One thing we can add later is to note which layouts are randomly selected for your starting base. Not sure how random the base selection is, as I can only remember getting 3 - 4 common selections on each restart (like Warehouse Two for the superhuman map is almost the default base), but not some others. -[[User:NKF|NKF]] 00:46, 17 November 2009 (EST)