<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://temp.ufopaedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Junkbone</id>
	<title>UFOpaedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://temp.ufopaedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Junkbone"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://temp.ufopaedia.org/Special:Contributions/Junkbone"/>
	<updated>2026-05-03T08:59:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://temp.ufopaedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Base_Defence&amp;diff=8635</id>
		<title>Talk:Base Defence</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://temp.ufopaedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Base_Defence&amp;diff=8635"/>
		<updated>2006-09-09T20:18:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Junkbone: Defense Question&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Base Disjoint Bug==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference for the base disjoint bug is at: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.geocities.com/nkfarma/reference/bdb.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If anyone wants to remodel or redraw it in a more suitable form or make it easier to understand, then please feel free to do so. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other thoughts I might have is to give a rough indication of the layout of ground modules to allow players to plan ahead and perhaps even make use of the disjointed walls. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Also note - hangar and small radar are the safest modules to place in lower right)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- NKF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 80-item limit ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is listed in [[Known Bugs]]. [JFG]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==um,==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote (at article page): &amp;quot;An inbound Battleship on a &amp;quot;Retaliation&amp;quot; mission means there is a high chance that a Base Defense mission is in the &#039;&#039;&#039;offing&#039;&#039;&#039; for you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is it supposed to be &amp;quot;offering&amp;quot;  OR  &amp;quot;offing&amp;quot; such as &amp;quot;knocking you off, hitman-style&amp;quot; Coulkd be a typo by author  [[User:EsTeR|EsTeR]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== yeah, &amp;quot;offing&amp;quot; is real English... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
real informal English, but common, just the same. It derives from the phrase &amp;quot;setting off on a journey&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;about to set off&amp;quot; and wound up just being, &amp;quot;in the offing&amp;quot;. You can delete both these comments after reading. Good to talk with ya again :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No Retreat!,No Surrender! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Always have rocket launching tanks at ready.Leaving a base without blowing up at least 10 Snakemen scum is a stain on our honor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kill the Alien,Purge the Alien,Burn the....Alien!And yes I&#039;m a WH40k bitch--[[User:X-COM:Turcocalypse|X-COM:Turcocalypse]] 13:02, 22 April 2006 (PDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Defense Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If your defenses hit the UFO but don&#039;t disable it, does it have any effect on the number of aliens in the landing party?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Junkbone</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>